Literature DB >> 8937279

Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment.

A Templeton1, J K Morris, W Parslow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment depends both on the overall success rate in the treating clinic and on the characteristics of the couple seeking treatment. Since 1991, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has been collecting information on all IVF cycles carried out in the UK. This database has been analysed to identify the factors that affect the outcome of treatment.
METHODS: All IVF treatment cycles and outcomes registered between August, 1991, and April, 1994, were identified (52507). Cycles that involved gamete or embryo donation, frozen embryo transfer, or micromanipulation and unstimulated cycles were excluded. Thus, 36961 cycles (70% of those registered) were included in the analysis. The main outcome measure was liverbirth rate per cycle started. The relation between age and outcome was investigated by fitting of different fractional polynomials of age with logistic regression models. All other factors were analysed by logistic regression with age included in the model.
FINDINGS: The overall livebirth rate per cycle of treatment was 13.9%. The highest livebirth rates were in the age-group 25-30 years; younger women had lower rates and there was a sharp decline in older women. At all ages over 30, use of donor eggs was associated with a significantly higher livebirth rate than use of the woman's own eggs, but there was also a downward trend in success rate with age (p = 0.04). After adjustment for age, there was a significant decrease in livebirth rate with increasing duration of infertility from 1 to 12 years (p < 0.001). The medical indication for treatment had no significant effect on the outcome. Previous pregnancy and livebirth significantly increased treatment success. The possibility of success decreased with each IVF treatment cycle.
INTERPRETATION: We were able to identify by logistic regression the factors that significantly affect the outcome of IVF treatment, and to measure the magnitude of that effect. These factors should be taken into account in assessment of IVF results. After allowance for background clinic success rates, these factors can be used to predict outcome in individual cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8937279     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05291-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  93 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances. Gynaecology.

Authors:  C Kelleher; P Braude
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

Review 2.  Endometriosis: aetiology, pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  T J Child; S L Tan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Antral follicle counting in predicting the retrieved oocyte number after ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Y Y Hsieh; C C Chang; H D Tsai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian women.

Authors:  Amanda Souza Setti; Sylvia Sanches Cortezzi; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Ciro Dresch Martinhago; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Management of infertility.

Authors:  D J Cahill; P G Wardle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-06

6.  Prolonged gonadotropin stimulation is associated with decreased ART success.

Authors:  Meleen Chuang; Athena Zapantis; Martina Taylor; Sangita K Jindal; Genevieve S Neal-Perry; Harry J Lieman; Alex Joel Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The endometrial response to chorionic gonadotropin is blunted in a baboon model of endometriosis.

Authors:  J R A Sherwin; J M Hastings; K S Jackson; P A Mavrogianis; A M Sharkey; A T Fazleabas
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Deep phenotyping to predict live birth outcomes in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Prajna Banerjee; Bokyung Choi; Lora K Shahine; Sunny H Jun; Kathleen O'Leary; Ruth B Lathi; Lynn M Westphal; Wing H Wong; Mylene W M Yao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christianne M Verhaak; Jesper M J Smeenk; Andrea W M Evers; Agnes van Minnen; Jan A M Kremer; Floris W Kraaimaat
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

10.  A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; G David Ball
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.