Literature DB >> 24934487

A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.

Barbara Luke1, Morton B Brown2, Ethan Wantman3, Judy E Stern4, Valerie L Baker5, Eric Widra6, Charles C Coddington7, William E Gibbons8, G David Ball9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model predictive of live-birth rates (LBR) and multiple birth rates (MBR) for an individual considering assisted reproduction technology (ART) using linked cycles from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) for 2004-2011.
DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort.
SETTING: Clinic-based data. PATIENT(S): 288,161 women with an initial autologous cycle, of whom 89,855 did not become pregnant and had a second autologous cycle and 39,334 did not become pregnant in the first and second cycles and had a third autologous cycle, with an additional 33,598 women who had a cycle using donor oocytes (first donor cycle). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): LBRs and MBRs modeled by woman's age, body mass index, gravidity, prior full-term births, infertility diagnoses by oocyte source, fresh embryos transferred, and cycle, using backward-stepping logistic regression with results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULT(S): The LBRs increased in all models with prior full-term births, number of embryos transferred; in autologous cycles also with gravidity, diagnoses of male factor, and ovulation disorders; and in donor cycles also with the diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve. The MBR increased in all models with number of embryos transferred and in donor cycles also with prior full-term births. For both autologous and donor cycles, transferring two versus one embryo greatly increased the probability of a multiple birth (AOR 27.25 and 38.90, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): This validated predictive model will be implemented on the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Web site (www.sart.org) so that patients considering initiating a course of ART can input their data on the Web site to generate their expected outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; BMI; donor cycle; prediction model

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24934487      PMCID: PMC4188433          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  18 in total

1.  Female obesity adversely affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy and live birth rates.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Judy E Stern; Stacey A Missmer; Victor Y Fujimoto; Richard Leach
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment.

Authors:  A Templeton; J K Morris; W Parslow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States.

Authors:  Aniket D Kulkarni; Denise J Jamieson; Howard W Jones; Dmitry M Kissin; Maria F Gallo; Maurizio Macaluso; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Multivariate analysis of factors affecting probability of pregnancy and live birth with in vitro fertilization: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ruben Alvero; John L Frattarelli; Rebecca Usadi; David A Grainger; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Prognostic models for the probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and the importance of testing their predictive value.

Authors:  A M Stolwijk; G A Zielhuis; C J Hamilton; H Straatman; J M Hollanders; H J Goverde; P A van Dop; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; Stacey A Missmer; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Jason K Min; Sue A Breheny; Vivien MacLachlan; David L Healy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Victor Y Fujimoto; Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Tarun Jain; Alicia Armstrong; David A Grainger; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Marcelle I Cedars; Tarun Jain; Nancy A Klein; C Martin Beaird; David A Grainger; William E Gibbons
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles.

Authors:  Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  22 in total

1.  Male factor infertility: Prediction models for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Jeani Chang; Sheree Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry Kissin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Michel Menard; Rosalie Cabry; Florence Scheffler; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Marie-Thérèse Le Martelot; Sylvie Roche; Jean-Jacques Chabaud; Henri Copin; Hortense Drapier; Moncef Benkhalifa; Damien Beauvillard
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Cumulative probabilities of live birth across multiple complete IVF/ICSI cycles: a call for attention.

Authors:  Juan J Tarín; Eva Pascual; Santiago Pérez-Hoyos; Raúl Gómez; Miguel A García-Pérez; Antonio Cano
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Accounting for past patient composition in evaluations of quality reporting.

Authors:  Katherine I Tierney; Samuel Fishman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.734

7.  Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women.

Authors:  David J McLernon; Ewout W Steyerberg; Egbert R Te Velde; Amanda J Lee; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-11-16

8.  Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.

Authors:  Klaus F Bühler; Robert Fischer; Patrice Verpillat; Arthur Allignol; Sandra Guedes; Emmanuelle Boutmy; Wilma Bilger; Emilia Richter; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Models Predicting Success of Infertility Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alireza Zarinara; Hojjat Zeraati; Koorosh Kamali; Kazem Mohammad; Parisa Shahnazari; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tamara Tobias; Fady I Sharara; Jason M Franasiak; Patrick W Heiser; Emily Pinckney-Clark
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.