Literature DB >> 21550038

The long-term outcome of 946 consecutive couples visiting a fertility clinic in 2001-2003.

Janneke Donckers1, Johannes L H Evers, Jolande A Land.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of fertility work-up, treatment, and dropout in a cohort of subfertile couples in a well-defined area in Western Europe.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Maastricht University Medical Center. PATIENT(S): Subfertile couples referred by their general physician between 2001 and 2003. INTERVENTION(S): Demographic data, findings of the fertility investigation, and outcome of treatment were entered prospectively into a database. Follow-up was performed until November 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Diagnosis, treatment, dropout rate, pregnancy rate, and live-birth rate. RESULT(S): During the study period, 946 couples were referred, of whom 17% dropped out. Follow-up was complete in 94% of couples. Spontaneous pregnancies occurred in 28% of all couples, and there were 32% treatment-dependent pregnancies. IVF (51% live births in couples treated) and no treatment/expectant management (50%) were the most effective treatments. CONCLUSION(S): After 5-8 years, 51% of couples referred for subfertility had at least one live birth.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21550038     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; William Gibbons; Glenn L Schattman; Rogerio A Lobo; Richard E Leach; Judy E Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Epidemiologic Approaches for Studying Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Design, Methods, Analysis and Interpretation.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Audrey J Gaskins
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-04-17

3.  Second try: who returns for additional assisted reproductive technology treatment and the effect of a prior assisted reproductive technology birth.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Valerie L Baker; Daniel R Grow; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Subfertility in Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Outcome of Fertility Assessments.

Authors:  Jenny Brouwer; Rosalie Fleurbaaij; Johanna M W Hazes; Radboud J E M Dolhain; Joop S E Laven
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Live birth outcome, spontaneous pregnancy and adoption up to five years after undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Authors:  Helena Volgsten; Lone Schmidt
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  'Genes versus children': if the goal is parenthood, are we using the optimal approach?

Authors:  Jackson C Kirkman-Brown; Mariana V Martins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.