Literature DB >> 19783833

When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population.

M Brandes1, J O M van der Steen, S B Bokdam, C J C M Hamilton, J P de Bruin, W L D M Nelen, J A M Kremer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of subfertile couples discontinues fertility care before achieving pregnancy. Most studies on dropouts are related to IVF. The aim here is to examine dropout rates at all stages of fertility care.
METHODS: We analysed a consecutive cohort of 1391 couples, referred to our secondary care hospital between January 2002 and December 2006. Discontinuation rates were studied at six stages. Stage I: immediately after first visit, Stage II: during diagnostic workup, Stage III: after finishing diagnostic workup but before treatment, Stage IV: during or after non-IVF treatment, Stage V: during IVF, Stage VI: after at least 3 cycles of IVF. Reasons to discontinue and spontaneous pregnancy rates after discontinuation were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: In our cohort 319 couples dropped out of fertility care, 76.8%, [95% confidence interval (CI): 72.2-81.4] on their own initiative and 23.2% (95% CI: 18.6-27.8) on doctor's advice. Percentage (95% CI) of couples discontinuing per stage were: Stage I 6.0% (3.4-8.6), Stage II 3.4% (1.5-5.5), Stage III 35.7% (30.5-41.0), Stage IV 23.5% (18.9-28.2), Stage V 17.9% (13.7-22.1) and Stage VI 13.5% (9.7-17.2). Main reasons for dropout (%, 95% CI) were 'emotional distress' (22.3%, 17.7-26.8), 'poor prognosis' (18.8%, 14.5-23.1) and 'reject treatment' (17.2%, 13.1-21.4). The spontaneous ongoing pregnancy rate after discontinuation was 10% (6.7-13.3).
CONCLUSION: About half of the couples stopped before any fertility treatment was started and one-third stopped after at least one IVF cycle. The main reasons for withdrawal were emotional distress and poor prognosis. This insight may help to improve quality of patient care by making care more responsive to the needs and expectations of subfertile couples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19783833     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  52 in total

1.  First contact: the intersection of demographics, knowledge, and appraisal of treatment at the initial infertility visit.

Authors:  Krista J Childress; Angela K Lawson; Marissa S Ghant; Gricelda Mendoza; Eden R Cardozo; Edmond Confino; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Assisted reproductive technology treatments and quality of life: a longitudinal study among subfertile women and men.

Authors:  Francesca Agostini; Fiorella Monti; Federica Andrei; Marcella Paterlini; Stefano Palomba; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Infertile women who screen positive for depression are less likely to initiate fertility treatments.

Authors:  Natalie M Crawford; Heather S Hoff; Jennifer E Mersereau
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; William Gibbons; Glenn L Schattman; Rogerio A Lobo; Richard E Leach; Judy E Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  IVM is an alternative for patients with PCO after failed conventional IVF attempt.

Authors:  Bulent Gulekli; Muge Kovali; Fulya Aydiner; Sule Dogan; Seda S Dogan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Predicting suitable timing for artificial reproductive technology treatment in aged infertile women.

Authors:  Nana Akino; Wataru Isono; Osamu Wada-Hiraike
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-29

7.  Factors associated with early in vitro fertilization treatment discontinuation.

Authors:  Bronwyn S Bedrick; Kelsey Anderson; Darcy E Broughton; Barton Hamilton; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Time costs of fertility care: the hidden hardship of building a family.

Authors:  Alex K Wu; Peter Elliott; Patricia P Katz; James F Smith
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The long path to pregnancy: early experience with dual anonymous gamete donation in a European in vitro fertilisation referral centre.

Authors:  Eric Scott Sills; Lyubov O Mykhaylyshyn; Ulyana S Dorofeyeva; David J Walsh; Umme Salma; Ahmed B Omar; Graham D Coull; Ileana A David; Kathy M Brickell; Olga M Tsar; Anthony Ph Walsh
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.

Authors:  R Anguzu; R Cusatis; N Fergestrom; A Cooper; K D Schoyer; J B Davis; J Sandlow; K E Flynn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.