Literature DB >> 23975433

Role of DNA damage response pathways in preventing carcinogenesis caused by intrinsic replication stress.

M D Wallace1, T L Southard2, K J Schimenti3, J C Schimenti4.   

Abstract

Defective DNA replication can result in genomic instability, cancer and developmental defects. To understand the roles of DNA damage response (DDR) genes on carcinogenesis in mutants defective for core DNA replication components, we utilized the Mcm4(Chaos3/Chaos3) ('Chaos3') mouse model that, by virtue of an amino-acid alteration in MCM4 that destabilizes the MCM2-7 DNA replicative helicase, has fewer dormant replication origins and an increased number of stalled replication forks. This leads to genomic instability and cancer in most Chaos3 mice. We found that animals doubly mutant for Chaos3 and components of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) double-strand break response pathway (Atm, p21/Cdkn1a and Chk2/Chek2) had decreased tumor latency and/or increased tumor susceptibility. Tumor latency and susceptibility differed between genetic backgrounds and genders, with females demonstrating an overall greater cancer susceptibility to Atm and p21 deficiency than males. Atm deficiency was semilethal in the Chaos3 background and impaired embryonic fibroblast proliferation, suggesting that ATM drug inhibitors might be useful against tumors with DNA replication defects. Hypomorphism for the 9-1-1 component Hus1 did not affect tumor latency or susceptibility in Chaos3 animals, and tumors in these mice did not exhibit impaired ATR pathway signaling. These and other data indicate that under conditions of systemic replication stress, the ATM pathway is particularly important both for cancer suppression and viability during development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23975433      PMCID: PMC3936004          DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


INTRODUCTION

Genomic studies have shown that many individual genes are spontaneously mutated or misregulated at low frequencies in cancers, but together comprise disruptions in a few key pathways [1-3]. Alterations in DNA checkpoint and repair pathways are particularly significant. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are altered in over 1/3 of serous ovarian and basal type breast cancer cases, highlighting the importance of the homologous recombination (HR) pathway of DSB repair [2, 4]. During HR repair, DSBs are bound by the MRN (MRE11/RAD50/NBS1) damage sensor complex, the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) serine/threonine kinase becomes activated via autophosphorylation and, in conjunction with mediator proteins such as BRCA1, signals to downstream transducer and effector kinases to elicit checkpoint and repair responses (reviewed by [5, 6]). DDR pathways are responsible for helping maintain genomic stability and suppressing tumorigenesis [7]. To control cell cycle progression under conditions of DNA damage or replication stress, DDR genes also target components of the DNA replication machinery, including the Minichromosome maintenance 2-7 (MCM2-7) replicative helicase complex. MCM2 is a direct target of ATR (ATM and RAD9-related), and MCM3 is a target of ATM [8, 9]. Whereas the relationship between defects in various DNA repair systems to cancer is well studied, this is not the case for DNA replication - the process during which the greatest opportunity for mutations exists. Accumulating evidence points to associations between deficiencies of the core DNA replication machinery and cancer. For example, mice bearing mutations in the proofreading functions of the major replicative polymerases δ and ε exhibit mutator phenotypes and cancer predisposition [10-13]. Furthermore, Pol ε is frequently mutated in human colorectal cancers [14]. In addition to DNA polymerases, mutations in components of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) have been linked to cancer susceptibility. These complexes assemble at replication origins during G1 phase (but not during S phase), and a subset of these components constitute the CDC45/MCM2-7/GINS (CMG) replicative helicase complex that unwinds DNA in front of the replisome during S phase [15-17]. The highly conserved MCM2-7 heterohexameric complex is an essential component of the pre-RC and constitutes the core of the replicative helicase (reviewed in [18]). Whereas Mcm2-7 are essential genes, hypomorphic alleles in mice cause GIN, cancer susceptibility, and cell proliferation defects [19-21], as does overexpression and haploinsufficiency [22-24]. To better understand the in vivo impact of the DDR on cancer incidence and tumor latency under conditions of increased replication stress, we utilized the Mcm4 (“Chaos3”) mouse model that bears a single amino acid mutation in MCM4 (Phe345Ile). Chaos3 mice have dramatically elevated GIN, and depending on the strain background, Chaos3 mice are predisposed to various cancers including mammary tumors, histiocytic sarcoma, lymphoma, and bone tumors [19, 24, 25]. The Chaos3 mutation destabilizes the MCM2-7 helicase by disrupting MCM4:MCM6 interaction, somehow triggering a post-transcription decrease in the levels of all MCM2-7 mRNA and proteins [24-26]. This reduces the number of dormant replication origins available as backups to replicate DNA near stalled replication forks. These defects contribute to elevated chromosome breakage and segregation defects in Chaos3 mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) [25]. Studies of diploid S. cerevisiae engineered to carry the identical Chaos3 amino acid change in MCM4 indicated that the defective helicase causes replication fork collapse, leading to DSBs that require repair by HR [27]. Consistent with replication fork damage leading to DSBs that trigger HR, Chaos3 MEFs have increased levels of RAD51 and BLM foci [25]. Additionally, they exhibit upregulation of p53/TRP53 and p21, indicative that cell cycle checkpoint responses are activated in these cells [28]. DDR pathways aid proper DNA replication by stabilizing transiently stalled forks to prevent the dissociation of replisome components, promoting replication restart, and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. The ATM pathway is activated in response to DSBs, while the ATR pathway is activated by RPA-coated ssDNA at stalled replication forks. However, there is clearly overlap and cross-signaling between the pathways [29]. Failure to safeguard genome integrity during DNA replication is associated with increased cancer predisposition [30, 31]. Despite intact DDR pathways, the elevated GIN in Chaos3 mice eventually result in recurrent segmental copy number alterations that apparently drive carcinogenesis, with a mean latency of 12 months in the case of mammary tumors [19, 32]. Here, we exploit this model, in conjunction with mutations in DDR genes, to better understand cellular responses to endogenous replication stress on an organismal level and the impact on carcinogenesis in vivo.

RESULTS

We generated Chaos3 mice that were also deficient for the ATM pathway (Atm or Chk2), ATR pathway (Hus1), or the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 that is downstream of both signaling pathways (Figure 1a). At the time of crossing, Mcm4 (abbreviated hereafter as Mcm4, or just “C3” in the figures) was congenic in strain C3H/HeBFeJ (C3H), but the other mutations were on different strain backgrounds (see Materials and Methods). C3H-Mcm4 females develop exclusively mammary adenocarcinomas, but males of that genotype and strain background were not reported to be tumor prone [19]. In a mixed genetic background however, other tumor types in females arise (including lymphoma and histiocytic sarcoma) [19, 25]. Additionally, males of mixed strain background were also found to be tumor prone, though the sample size was small and most mice were not aged past 14 months [19]. Here, mutant and control mice of both sexes were aged for eighteen months or until they showed signs of disease, after which a complete necropsy was performed. The results for each set of compound mutants are described below.
Figure 1

Atm deficiency impacts Chaos3 tumor latency and tumor susceptibility

(A) DNA damage response pathways. Key genes in DDR pathways are shown with the ATR and ATM DNA damage sensors emphasized in gray boxes. Genes perturbed in this study are indicated by red ovals. (B) Kaplan-Meier graphs of the indicated genotypes and sexes. Mcm4 and Mcm4 females have significantly decreased tumor latency compared to Mcm4 alone (see statistics in Supplementary Table 2). Mcm4 males neared statistical significance for decreased tumor latency, and Mcm4 male tumor latency was similar to Mcm4 alone (Supplementary Table 2). C3 = Mcm4. (C) Tumor spectra of selected genotypes. HS=histiocytic sarcoma, MT=mammary tumor, BT=bone tumor, Ly=lymphoma, None=healthy (no detectable cancer), PCT=plasma cell tumor, RCT=round cell tumor, GCT=granulosa cell tumor, Lv=liver, MH=myeloid hyperplasia, AD=adrenal ganglioneuroma, Un=unknown tumor type. Note that tumor spectrum is affected by genotype and gender, and that Mcm4 females are more susceptible to cancer than males. C3 = Mcm4.

ATM deficiency impacts viability, cell proliferation, tumor latency, and tumor susceptibility of Chaos3 mice

Activation of ATM in response to DSBs triggers several key downstream events. It directly phosphorylates H2AX residing at (and near) the site of DNA breaks. It also phosphorylates downstream targets such as CHK2 to activate the DNA damage checkpoint, leading to cell cycle delay or apoptosis (Figure 1a) [33]. ATM deficiency is associated with the development of lymphomas and leukemias in humans and mice. Atm mice develop thymic lymphomas at 2-4 months of age [34, 3536, 37]. We analyzed 648 weaned offspring from mouse crosses bearing Atm and Mcm4 genotype combinations, but only 25 of the expected 65 double homozygotes were obtained (P=6.03*10-6) (Supplementary Figure 1a). To investigate the nature of the semi-lethal phenotype, we examined mid-late gestation embryos from timed matings that would yield double mutants and controls. Mcm4 embryos were present at expected ratios at and prior to E15.5 (χ2 P=0.97 and P=0.65, respectively; Supplementary Table 1), but at E18.5 they were smaller than control littermates and/or apparently dead or dying (Supplementary Figure 1b). To better understand the basis for the embryonic lethality at the cellular level, cell proliferation assays were conducted on MEFs of various genotypes. Complete absence of ATM dramatically decreased growth rate regardless of Chaos3 genotype, but Atm heterozygosity also reduced proliferation in Mcm4 but not Mcm4 MEFs (Supplementary Figure 1c). The results suggest that reduced cell proliferation is not entirely responsible for the synthetic lethality of Atm embryos. The early-onset lymphoma susceptibility caused by complete ATM deficiency obscured the detection of potential effects on mammary tumorigenesis. Nearly all Mcm4 and Mcm4 mice succumbed to lymphoma at ~2-4 months of age (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Table 3), compared to much longer tumor latency in Mcm4 animals (Figure 1b, Supplementary Table 2). While several studies have reported that heterozygosity for Atm null mutations (alone or in conjunction with Apc or p53 mutations) had no effect on mouse spontaneous tumor frequencies [38-41], a role for ATM in mammary tumor prevention was evident in Mcm4 and Mcm4 animals. Females of these genotypes had median mammary tumor latencies of 10.95 and 9.3 months, respectively, both significantly shorter than Mcm4 alone (14.95 months; respectively: LRMCT P=0.001, P=0.0027; GBWT P=0.0031, P=0.0005). Mcm4 males neared statistical significance for decreased tumor latency (LRMCT P=0.0751; GBWT P=0.0729), and Mcm4 male tumor latency was similar to Mcm4 alone (LRMCT P=0.472; GBWT P=0.4339) (Figure 1b, Supplementary Table 2). Heterozygosity for Atm had a striking effect on the spectrum of tumors in mice bearing the Chaos3 allele. Whereas histiocytic sarcoma was prevalent in Mcm4 mice of mixed strain background (41% in females; 60% in males), its incidence declined in Mcm4 mice (≤5% in females and males). Meanwhile, lymphoma and other cancer types increased (FET P=0.0093; P=0.0001; Figure 1c). The tumor spectrum also differed between genotypes and gender. Nearly all females (98%) of the Mcm4, and Mcm4genotypes developed cancer by the end of the study, vs. 72% of males of the same genotypes (FET P=0.0001). In particular, Mcm4 females were far more susceptible to cancer than males (FET P=0.0223; Figure 1b, Figure S1). The incidence of mammary tumors was also high in females of these genotypes, but absent in males, influencing overall differences in tumor spectrum.

Chk2 deficiency impacts tumor latency in Chaos3 females and susceptibility in males

CHK2 is a phosphorylation target of ATM and serves as a downstream effector of the DSB checkpoint response (Figure 1a)[42]. In some circumstances, CHK2 can also be activated by ATR [43, 44]. When activated, the CHK2 kinase can phosphorylate p53, protecting it from MDM2-catalyzed ubiquitination and degradation [42]. Other targets include BRCA1, which is involved in HR repair [4546]. In sum, CHK2 activation can lead to DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, or apoptotic cell death. Unlike Atm or p53, several studies have shown that Chk2 null mice do not spontaneously develop tumors [4748-51]. However, Mcm4 females had decreased tumor latency compared to Mcm4 alone in a mixed C3H x B6 background (LRMCT P=0.0189, GBWT P=0.027; Figure 2, Supplementary Table 2). Interestingly, although the overall tumor incidence was identical, the fraction of mammary tumors in Mcm4 females rose significantly from 15% to 50% (Supplementary Figure 2; FET P=.002). Mcm4 males did not have a statistically different latency compared to Mcm4 alone, and their cancer incidence was similar to females of the same genotype (Figure 2). However, Mcm4 males were more susceptible to cancer (73%) than Mcm4 controls (44%; Supplementary Figure 2).
Figure 2

Effects of Chk2 deficiency upon tumorigenesis in Chaos3 mice

Kaplan-Meier graphs of the indicated genotypes and sexes are shown. Mcm4 female mice have significantly decreased time to tumor onset than Mcm4 alone. C3 = Mcm4.

Hus1 deficiency has no impact on tumor latency or cancer susceptibility in Chaos3 mice

The study of ATR pathway genes in tumorigenesis is complicated by embryonic lethality that occurs in nulls for Atr, Chk1, the RAD9-RAD1-HUS1 (9-1-1) complex members Rad9a and Hus1, and the 9-1-1 clamp loader Rad17. The 9-1-1 complex is a PCNA-like clamp that loads onto damage sites and recruits the ATR activator TOPBP1 [52]. Mice with genetically reduced HUS1 levels are viable, normal in appearance, but are not tumor susceptible, and do not experience accelerated tumorigenesis in a p53-deficient background [53]. Graded levels of Hus1 expression can be achieved using the following combinations of null (Hus1) and hypomorphic (Hus1) alleles: Hus1 (71.4% of WT), Hus1 (43.5% of WT), and Hus1 (20.8% of WT) [53]. We used these allele combinations to examine the effects of ATR pathway perturbation upon cancer latency and frequency in Mcm4 mice. However, none of the Hus1 mutant genotypes had significantly different cancer susceptibility or latency compared to Mcm4Hus1 mice (Figure 3a, Supplementary Figure 3, Supplementary Table 2).
Figure 3

Hus1 deficiency has no effect upon tumorigenesis or checkpoint signaling in Chaos3 mice and tumors

(A) Chaos3 x Hus1 tumor latency. Mcm4 mice do not have significantly different (see statistics in Supplementary Table 2) time to tumor onset than Mcm4 alone. C3 = Mcm4. (B) Western blot analysis of Mcm4 mammary tumors with a gradation of Hus1 hypomorphism. The genotypes are abbreviated as follows: “Δ” is a null allele (Hus1); “Neo” is a hypomorphic (Hus1) allele; “+” is the WT allele. For levels of HUS1 in these genotypes, see the text. Antibodies used are as indicated to the left of the panels. The results shown are from the same Western blot that was stripped and reprobed sequentially, following verification of effective stripping.

The lack of an effect upon cancer phenotypes led us to test whether the hypomorphic Hus1 genotypes actually impact checkpoint signaling in Mcm4 mammary tumors. Consistent with previous genomic analyses of Mcm4 mammary tumors showing that p53 deletions are infrequent in this model [32], p53 levels were robust in most of the 8 tumors tested by Western blotting (Figure 3b), likely reflecting checkpoint-mediated stabilization [54]. There was no correlation between levels of p53 and four genotypes of Hus1 representing a gradation of HUS1 levels (see above). CHK1 activation, as indicated by phosphorylation of SER345 that is catalyzed by ATR in response to replication or genotoxic stress [55], roughly paralleled the p53 levels in this tumor set. These data indicate that Hus1 hypomorphism has little impact on ATR axis damage signalling in these tumors. Interestingly however, Mcm4 mice exhibited abnormal craniofacial features (not shown) similar to mice deficient for both Hus1 and Atm [56], suggesting that there is an impact of HUS1 deficiency in some non-tumorigenic cell types during development of Mcm4 mice.

p21 deficiency exacerbates tumor frequency and onset in Chaos3 mice

p21 is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and downstream target of p53 that halts cell cycle progression when activated (Figure 1a). It functions by blocking the activity of cyclin-CDK complexes (CDK2 and CDC2), and can inhibit proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and therefore DNA replication [57]. Despite being a p53 target, mice lacking p21 are not cancer-prone as are p53 mutants [58]. Mice homozygous for Chaos3 or the hypomorphic Mcm2 allele (Mcm2) exhibit modestly elevated p53 phosphorylation and p21 expression. Furthermore, p53 mutation in either of these backgrounds increases embryonic lethality and accelerates cancer formation in survivors [23, 28]. These results are indicative of important cellular roles for the downstream targets of checkpoint pathways in replication-deficient mice. To explore if p53 signaling to p21 (Figure 1a) is important for tumor prevention in animals with intrinsic replication stress, the effects of p21 deficiency was examined in Chaos3 mice. While embryonic development of double mutant animals was not affected as are p53/Mcm4 embryos [28], p21 nullizygosity significantly decreased time to tumor onset of Chaos3 males and females (Figure 4; Supplementary Table 2), with the predominant tumor class being histiocytic sarcomas in this mixed C3H × B6 background (Supplementary Figure 4). Mcm4 females, but not males, also had significantly decreased tumor latency compared to Mcm4 alone (Figure 4; Supplementary Table 2). Finally, cancer susceptibility was elevated in Mcm4 and Mcm4 vs. Mcm4 females (55%, 42% and 21%, respectively; Supplementary Figure 4).
Figure 4

p21 deficiency impacts Chaos3 tumor latency in males and females and tumor susceptibility in females

Kaplan-Meier graphs of the indicated genotypes and sexes are shown. Mcm4 male and female mice have significantly decreased time to tumor onset than Mcm4 alone. Mcm4 females, but not males, also have significantly decreased tumor latency compared to Mcm4 alone. See statistics in Supplementary Table 2. C3 = Mcm4.

DISCUSSION

Much is known about the molecular biology of the ATM and ATR pathways, their roles in responding to various types of DNA damage, and the impacts upon the cell cycle. However, most of this knowledge is based upon in vitro biochemical studies or experiments performed in cultured cells or in yeast. Regarding in vivo roles, mouse knockout models have been created for most genes in the ATM and ATR pathways, and phenotypes defined and compared to corresponding human diseases. Especially for the ATM pathway, these mouse models (and cells derived from them) have been exploited to characterize the types of DNA damage to which they primarily respond, such as DSBs. However, certain complications have limited studies on the effects of, and responses to, replication stress in vivo, despite the recognition that it is a major driver of genomic instability and tumorigenesis [59, 60]. These complications include the embryonic lethality of null mutations in the Atr pathway, and the dearth of suitably relevant models of non-oncogene-associated replication stress. Here, we utilized the Chaos3 mouse model to better understand the importance of DDR pathways in whole organisms with intrinsic replication stress, particularly with respect to carcinogenesis. This model is powerful and unique in that the replicative helicase mutation it bears (Mcm4) is not so disruptive that development is affected. The mutation destabilizes the MCM2-7 hexamer but not its unwinding activity, causes a decrease in dormant replication origins, and triggers multiple fork recovery pathways. These defects ultimately lead to elevated chromosome breaks, chromosome segregation defects and tumorigenesis [19, 25, 26]. Thus, there is opportunity to study the roles of both major DDR pathways (ATR and ATM) in cancer susceptibility without applying exogenous agents. Finally, the Chaos3 model does not involve artificial oncogene overexpression, the most commonly used strategy for inducing and studying replication stress in cancer [59]. Disruption of the ATM pathway via Atm or Chk2 mutation had the effect of exacerbating Chaos3 phenotypes. Most dramatic was that the Mcm4 genotype caused semilethality that was traceable to retarded in utero growth. One interpretation of this result is that Chaos3 cells, which sustain elevated DSBs that may arise from collapsed and/or persistently stalled replication forks that fail to be compensated by nearby dormant origin firing (dormant origins are reduced in Chaos3 mice [25]), accumulate a lethal level of persistent unrepaired DNA damage from the concurrent lack of DDR signaling. Stochastic factors or segregating background genetic variation may underlie the incomplete penetrance of lethality. Although early lymphoma onset in all Atm animals obscured possible effects of Chaos3 upon other cancer susceptibilities, both Mcm4 and Mcm4 mice exhibited decreased tumor latency and/or increased tumor susceptibility compared to controls (Mcm4 and Mcm4, respectively). Heterozygosity for Atm alone does not markedly elevate cancer rates or decrease latency in mice [34], but it does render them sensitive to sublethal doses ionizing irradiation [61]. Considering that Mcm4 heterozygotes have modestly elevated GIN (2-5 increase in erythrocyte micronuclei vs. 20 fold in homozygotes) but are not cancer prone [19], these data indicate that a synthetic phenotype results from the combination of either genetic (Chaos3 heterozygosity) or environmental (radiation) genomic stresses with a normally benign genetic reduction in ATM signaling. Similarly, heterozygosity for Chk2 also increased tumor incidence in Mcm4 heterozygotes. We consider these results as being supportive of the concept that heterozygosity of multiple key genes can drive carcinogenesis [62]. Notably, there is some evidence that human ATM mutation carriers are at moderately elevated risk for breast and possibly other cancers (for example, see [63]); it is unclear whether cancer outcome in these individuals is strictly an issue of penetrance or is modified by genetic background or environmental factors. Chk2 deficiency also increased tumor incidence and decreased tumor latency in Chaos3 mice, although viability wasn't affected as with the Mcm4 genotype. We interpret this to indicate that most cells from such animals do not retain a catastrophic level of unrepaired DSBs. The presence of ATM is predicted to allow initial localized responses to DSBs that may occur at collapsed forks, such as H2AX phosphorylation (γH2AX) and subsequent HR repair by RAD51 [64], which may reduce the damage burden below the threshold of cellular lethality or compromised proliferation. It is also possible that in the absence of CHK2, ATM activates CHK1 to stimulate repair responses [65]. Overall, both sets of experiments indicate that perturbation of the ATM pathway, which is involved primarily in the response to DSBs, increases cancer susceptibility in mice with intrinsic replication stress and elevated chromosomal instability/DSBs. HUS1 was shown to be is critical for CHK1 phosphorylation in response to exogenous genotoxins [66], and genetic reduction of Hus1 expression was shown to increase genome instability and hypersensitivity to replication inhibitors but not cancer susceptibility [53]. Using this hypomorphic Hus1 model for putative ATR pathway attenuation, we reasoned that Chaos3 mice might provide a sensitized system for uncovering possible roles of the ATR pathway in tumor suppression in mice with genetically predisposed replication stress. Notably, Chaos3 MEFs exhibit signs of ATR pathway activation in the form of modestly increased levels of RPA foci, RAD17 phosphorylation, and Chk1 phosphorylation (the latter in the B6 but not (B6 x C3H)F1 background [25, 28]. However, overall tumor latency and susceptibility were not altered in Chaos3 mice deficient for Hus1. In contrast, depletion of Atr in mice has been shown to suppress oncogene-induced tumors that normally exhibit replication stress [67, 68]. These observations contribute to the proposal that while ATR may suppress neoplastic transformation to some degree via its role in DNA damage responses, it may be required for subsequent survival and proliferation of tumors [68, 69]. Interestingly, severe depletion of ATR in a human patient was associated with growth defects and genomic instability but not cancer [70]. In light of those reports, we can offer two interpretations for our observations. One is that ~80% of HUS1 in Hus1 mice does not impact the levels of replication stress in Mcm4 cells. Another is that HUS1 may have a more significant role in DNA repair activities distinct from checkpoint signaling [71, 72], a concept not inconsistent with findings that compound deficiency for Atm & Hus1 or Hus1 & p53 severely affects animal growth and mammary epithelial maintenance, respectively, without increasing tumorigenesis. As mentioned earlier, the strong interaction between p53 and MCM deficiency (Chaos3 or Mcm homozygosity) demonstrated that intrinsic replication stresses ultimately trigger p53-dependent damage responses that preserve normal development and inhibit neoplastic transformation [2328]. A previous study suggested that the p21 upregulation observed in (C3HxB6)-Chaos3 mice was unlikely to contribute to tumor suppression because the mean tumor latency in Mcm4 was very similar to that of Mcm4. However, that study did not include Mcm4 animals as controls. We expanded that study to include both male and female mice and all the relevant control genotypes from related litters. The results indicate a role a tumor suppressive role of p21 in the Chaos3 model, but that it is probably relevant only in a subset of cells bearing a level of DNA damage that results in p53-mediated p21 transcription. During the course of this project, a total of 687 detailed necropsies were performed (Supplementary Table 4). Overall, the results are consistent with previous studies showing that genetic MCM depletion causes extreme cancer predisposition, but that genetic background is the primary determinant of cancer type [19, 23-25]. Because of this strong influence of strain background, possible Mcm- or checkpoint gene-specific alterations in tumor spectrum must be analyzed with caution. With this caveat, the shift towards mammary tumor susceptibility in the Chk2 -deficient Chaos3 mice of mixed background is notable. Although overall cancer rates were similar, the mammary tumor incidence in Mcm4 females (50%) was > 3 fold higher than that of Mcm4 relatives (15%, consistent with that in true C3HxB6 F1s [25]). Therefore, rather than a factor of genetic background, the increased mammary tumorigenesis may be attributable to Chk2 deficiency. Certain Chk2 alleles (not null alleles) are known to convey a 2-3 fold increased breast cancer risk [73]. Since Chk2 deficiency alone has not been associated with cancer in mice, the Chaos3 mutation may bring out a susceptibility that is evident in longer-living humans. In addition to genetic background effects, we found that tumor latency and susceptibility differed between genders in some of genotypes. Aside from cancers related to sexually dimorphic tissues such as mammary, ovary and prostate, differences in latency or frequency between sexes has been a longstanding puzzle. Differences are often hypothesized to be related to factors such as hormones, immune system differences, and differences in sex chromosome constitution [74]. Here, we observed that females had an overall greater cancer susceptibility to Atm and p21 deficiency than males. Cancer incidence in Mcm4 and Mcm4 females was double that of males of the same genotypes. Additionally, p21 nullizygosity increased the cancer incidence of Mcm4 females by 34%, but had no effect on males (Supplemental Fig 4). These results hint at a role for DNA repair pathways in sexual dimorphism in cancer susceptibility, which is not unprecedented in consideration of the consequences of BRCA1/2 deficiencies in female cancers. In humans, certain inherited Atm and p21 polymorphisms (ATM Ex1-81G>A, ATM D126E, and CDKN1A S31R) lead to decreased DDR response and efficiency, which is associated with increased risk of developing lung cancer in African American women [75]. It is possible that further studies in mice can get at the root of cancer susceptibility gender differences and interactions with genetic background. Overall, this study marks the importance of intact DDR pathways in responding to replication stress, providing protection from carcinogenesis when the DNA replication machinery is defective from birth. It remains unclear if lifelong exposure to exogenous sources of replication stress would benefit from the same DDR genes, but in vitro studies indicate this is likely to be so. Our findings also indicate that gender and genetic background significantly impacts cancer susceptibility and tumor latency when DNA replication integrity and DDR pathways are concurrently compromised. DDR pathways are being recognized as potential therapeutic targets in cancer treatment, since tumor cells can be hypersensitized to DNA damaging drugs when both overlapping pathways are inactivated or attenuated [76]. With increasing use of personalized genomics, it may be possible to effectively characterize the status of a tumor's endogenous DDR, and exploit weaknesses in an effective and targeted manner.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice

p21 mice (B6;129S2-Cdkn1a) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Hus1 mutant mice (Hus1 , abbreviated as Hus1; Hus1 abbreviated as Hus1) were obtained from R. Weiss [77, 78] as were Atm mutants (Atm, abbreviated as Atm) [36], and Chk2 (Chek2 , abbreviated as Chk2) from Tak Mak [79]. At the time of crossings, Chk2 and p21 mutants were congenic in C57BL/6J (B6), Atm was congenic in FvB, and the Hus1 animals were congenic in 129S6. Chaos3 C3HeB/FeJ (C3H) congenic animals were crossed to DDR mutants to generate double mutant animals that were of mixed genetic background. Progeny were genotyped as described in the original publications or as indicated by The Jackson Laboratory for those mice obtained from that source (http://jaxmice.jax.org). Double mutants and littermates of the same gender were aged to a terminal endpoint of eighteen months or until animals showed clinical signs of disease. Prism (GraphPad 5) statistical software was used to analyze survival curves and generate Kaplan-Meier plots.

MEF studies

Timed matings were conducted to collect embryos at embryonic days 12.5, 13.5, and 18.5. MEFs were generated, cultured, and cell proliferation assays performed as previously described [19].

Histopathology

Tumor samples were formalin-fixed and embedded in paraffin for sectioning and histological analysis. Slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) prior to histopathological evaluation.

Statistical analyses

The following tests of significance were performed and abbreviated as follows: LRMCT= Log-rank/Mantel-Cox Test; GBWT= Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test. LRMCT and GBWT are alternative methods that are applied to the survival curves; the latter gives more weight to deaths at earlier time points. The analysis was performed with Prism software (Graphpad). χ2 analysis was used to determine statistical significance of observed versus expected genotype ratios. FET was used to examine the significance of the association (contingency) between genotypes and gender to cancer susceptibility/frequency or subtype.

Western Blotting

Tissues were homogenized in T-PER (Pierce), plus complete EDTA-free proteinase inhibitor (Roche). Then, 40 ug of protein was subjected to electrophoresis on a 10% denaturing PAGE gel, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST). Membranes were incubated with the following antibodies at 1:1000 in 5% BSA in TBST overnight at 4 deg C: p53 Abcam #26 and CHK1 (SER345) Cell Signaling #2341. Beta-actin (Sigma #A1978) was employed at 1:10,000 in 5% BSA in TBST.
  79 in total

1.  MCM proteins and checkpoint kinases get together at the fork.

Authors:  David Shechter; Jean Gautier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A continuum model for tumour suppression.

Authors:  Alice H Berger; Alfred G Knudson; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase.

Authors:  Stephen E Moyer; Peter W Lewis; Michael R Botchan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DNA distress: just ring 9-1-1.

Authors:  Michael Kemp; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  ATM protein kinase: the linchpin of cellular defenses to stress.

Authors:  Shahzad Bhatti; Sergei Kozlov; Ammad Ahmad Farooqi; Ali Naqi; Martin Lavin; Kum Kum Khanna
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  S Matsuoka; G Rotman; A Ogawa; Y Shiloh; K Tamai; S J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma.

Authors:  Y Xu; T Ashley; E E Brainerd; R T Bronson; M S Meyn; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Chk2 suppresses the oncogenic potential of DNA replication-associated DNA damage.

Authors:  Travis H Stracker; Suzana S Couto; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Tulio Matos; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Deregulated minichromosomal maintenance protein MCM7 contributes to oncogene driven tumorigenesis.

Authors:  K A Honeycutt; Z Chen; M I Koster; M Miers; J Nuchtern; J Hicks; D R Roop; J M Shohet
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Mice heterozygous for mutation in Atm, the gene involved in ataxia-telangiectasia, have heightened susceptibility to cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Spring; Farida Ahangari; Shaun P Scott; Paul Waring; David M Purdie; Philip C Chen; Kevin Hourigan; Jonathan Ramsay; Peter J McKinnon; Michael Swift; Martin F Lavin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-08-26       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Dormant origins as a built-in safeguard in eukaryotic DNA replication against genome instability and disease development.

Authors:  Naoko Shima; Kayla D Pederson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

2.  The Chromatin Remodeling Component Arid1a Is a Suppressor of Spontaneous Mammary Tumors in Mice.

Authors:  Nithya Kartha; Lishuang Shen; Carolyn Maskin; Marsha Wallace; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  DNA damage and the balance between survival and death in cancer biology.

Authors:  Wynand P Roos; Adam D Thomas; Bernd Kaina
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  A unique mutator phenotype reveals complementary oncogenic lesions leading to acute leukemia.

Authors:  Mianmian Yin; Timour Baslan; Robert L Walker; Yuelin J Zhu; Amy Freeland; Toshihiro Matsukawa; Sriram Sridharan; André Nussenzweig; Steven C Pruitt; Scott W Lowe; Paul S Meltzer; Peter D Aplan
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-12-05

Review 5.  Trial Watch: Targeting ATM-CHK2 and ATR-CHK1 pathways for anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Gwenola Manic; Florine Obrist; Antonella Sistigu; Ilio Vitale
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2015-02-23

6.  The tumor suppressor Hic1 maintains chromosomal stability independent of Tp53.

Authors:  Anette Szczepny; Kirstyn Carey; Lisa McKenzie; W Samantha N Jayasekara; Fernando Rossello; Alvaro Gonzalez-Rajal; Andrew S McCaw; Dean Popovski; Die Wang; Anthony J Sadler; Annabelle Mahar; Prudence A Russell; Gavin Wright; Rachael A McCloy; Daniel J Garama; Daniel J Gough; Stephen B Baylin; Andrew Burgess; Jason E Cain; D Neil Watkins
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Inflammation, DNA Damage, Helicobacter pylori and Gastric Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Polyxeni Kalisperati; Evangelia Spanou; Ioannis S Pateras; Penelope Korkolopoulou; Anastasia Varvarigou; Ioannis Karavokyros; Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Panayiotis G Vlachoyiannopoulos; Stavros Sougioultzis
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  A concomitant loss of dormant origins and FANCC exacerbates genome instability by impairing DNA replication fork progression.

Authors:  Spencer W Luebben; Tsuyoshi Kawabata; Charles S Johnson; M Gerard O'Sullivan; Naoko Shima
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Inflammation, a significant player of Ataxia-Telangiectasia pathogenesis?

Authors:  Majid Zaki-Dizaji; Seyed Mohammad Akrami; Gholamreza Azizi; Hassan Abolhassani; Asghar Aghamohammadi
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.575

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.