Literature DB >> 21242538

Ploidy dictates repair pathway choice under DNA replication stress.

Xin Chenglin Li1, Bik K Tye.   

Abstract

This study reports an unusual ploidy-specific response to replication stress presented by a defective minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase allele in yeast. The corresponding mouse allele, Mcm4(Chaos3), predisposes mice to mammary gland tumors. While mcm4(Chaos3) causes replication stress in both haploid and diploid yeast, only diploid mutants exhibit G2/M delay, severe genetic instability (GIN), and reduced viability. These different outcomes are associated with distinct repair pathways adopted in haploid and diploid mutants. Haploid mutants use the Rad6-dependent pathways that resume stalled forks, whereas the diploid mutants use the Rad52- and MRX-dependent pathways that repair double strand breaks. The repair pathway choice is irreversible and not regulated by the availability of repair enzymes. This ploidy effect is independent of mating type heterozygosity and not further enhanced by increasing ploidy. In summary, a defective MCM helicase causes GIN only in particular cell types. In response to replication stress, early events associated with ploidy dictate the repair pathway choice. This study uncovers a fundamental difference between haplophase and diplophase in the maintenance of genome integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242538      PMCID: PMC3070513          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.125450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  46 in total

1.  Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair.

Authors:  H D Ulrich; S Jentsch
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Suvi Jain; Neal Sugawara; John Lydeard; Moreshwar Vaze; Nicolas Tanguy Le Gac; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast.

Authors:  Lyris M F de Godoy; Jesper V Olsen; Jürgen Cox; Michael L Nielsen; Nina C Hubner; Florian Fröhlich; Tobias C Walther; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The pachytene checkpoint and its relationship to evolutionary patterns of polyploidization and hybrid sterility.

Authors:  X C Li; B C Barringer; D A Barbash
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Control of transcription by cell size.

Authors:  Chia-Yung Wu; P Alexander Rolfe; David K Gifford; Gerald R Fink
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Michael Bozzella; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Mating type influences chromosome loss and replicative senescence in telomerase-deficient budding yeast by Dnl4-dependent telomere fusion.

Authors:  Damon H Meyer; Adam M Bailis
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle.

Authors:  Maximina H Yun; Kevin Hiom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Aneuploidy and improved growth are coincident but not causal in a yeast cancer model.

Authors:  Xin Chenglin Li; John C Schimenti; Bik K Tye
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast-sources and mechanisms.

Authors:  Adrianna Skoneczna; Aneta Kaniak; Marek Skoneczny
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  The genome-wide rate and spectrum of spontaneous mutations differ between haploid and diploid yeast.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Linnea Sandell; Christopher G James; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mechanisms and regulation of mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington; Rodney Rothstein; Michael Lisby
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Sgs1 Binding to Rad51 Stimulates Homology-Directed DNA Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lillian Campos-Doerfler; Salahuddin Syed; Kristina H Schmidt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Per aspera ad astra: When harmful chromosomal translocations become a plus value in genetic evolution. Lessons from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Valentina Tosato; Carlo V Bruschi
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2015-08-20

6.  Gene dosage effects in yeast support broader roles for the LOG1, HAM1 and DUT1 genes in detoxification of nucleotide analogues.

Authors:  Mattias Carlsson; Guo-Zhen Hu; Hans Ronne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ancient evolutionary trade-offs between yeast ploidy states.

Authors:  Enikö Zörgö; Karolina Chwialkowska; Arne B Gjuvsland; Elena Garré; Per Sunnerhagen; Gianni Liti; Anders Blomberg; Stig W Omholt; Jonas Warringer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Role of DNA damage response pathways in preventing carcinogenesis caused by intrinsic replication stress.

Authors:  M D Wallace; T L Southard; K J Schimenti; J C Schimenti
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 9.  The Mcm2-7 replicative helicase: a promising chemotherapeutic target.

Authors:  Nicholas E Simon; Anthony Schwacha
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The Main Role of Srs2 in DNA Repair Depends on Its Helicase Activity, Rather than on Its Interactions with PCNA or Rad51.

Authors:  Alex Bronstein; Lihi Gershon; Gilad Grinberg; Elisa Alonso-Perez; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 7.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.