Literature DB >> 20006736

Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways.

Daniël O Warmerdam1, Roland Kanaar.   

Abstract

Cell cycle checkpoint activation and DNA repair pathways govern genomic stability after genotoxic stress. Genotoxic insult results in activation of an interwoven network of DNA damage checkpoints and DNA repair pathways. Post-translational modifications on a number of proteins involved in both checkpoint activation and DNA repair play an important role in this cellular response. Genotoxic stress can induce a wide variety of DNA lesions. Among these DNA alterations are double-stranded breaks and single-stranded DNA gaps. Repair of these DNA alterations requires damage recognition and resection. Here we discuss how DNA repair and DNA damage checkpoints cooperate and deal with DNA damage. Processing of DNA lesions by structure-specific nucleases results in DNA-protein intermediates, which form the basis for checkpoint activation and DNA repair. Post-translational modifications like phosphorylation and ubiquitination modulate the DNA damage response in a spatial and temporal manner. Cell cycle-dependent regulation additionally plays a key role in the regulation of both DNA repair and checkpoint activation. We highlight recent advances in in vivo imaging that greatly expand our knowledge on the relationships between DNA damage checkpoints and DNA repair. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006736     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  46 in total

1.  Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response.

Authors:  Kuntian Luo; Haoxing Zhang; Liewei Wang; Jian Yuan; Zhenkun Lou
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Adeno-associated virus type 2 modulates the host DNA damage response induced by herpes simplex virus 1 during coinfection.

Authors:  Rebecca Vogel; Michael Seyffert; Regina Strasser; Anna P de Oliveira; Christiane Dresch; Daniel L Glauser; Nelly Jolinon; Anna Salvetti; Matthew D Weitzman; Mathias Ackermann; Cornel Fraefel
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Excision of uracil from transcribed DNA negatively affects gene expression.

Authors:  Bork Lühnsdorf; Bernd Epe; Andriy Khobta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Epigenetic regulation of genomic integrity.

Authors:  Angela K Deem; Xuan Li; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Polymorphisms of the XPC gene may contribute to the risk of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Zufei Li; Qi Zhong; Weiguo Zhou; Xuejun Chen; Xiaohong Chen; Jugao Fang; Zhigang Huang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-12-13

6.  Chromatin regulators and their impact on DNA repair and G2 checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Veronique A J Smits; Ignacio Alonso-de Vega; Daniël O Warmerdam
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe.

Authors:  Amanda K Ashley; Meena Shrivastav; Jingyi Nie; Courtney Amerin; Kyle Troksa; Jason G Glanzer; Shengqin Liu; Stephen O Opiyo; Diana D Dimitrova; Phuong Le; Brock Sishc; Susan M Bailey; Greg G Oakley; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-05-10

8.  Checkpoint kinase 2 is required for efficient immunoglobulin diversification.

Authors:  Kathrin Davari; Samantha Frankenberger; Angelika Schmidt; Nils-Sebastian Tomi; Berit Jungnickel
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Interplay of DNA damage and cell cycle signaling at the level of human replication protein A.

Authors:  Gloria E O Borgstahl; Kerry Brader; Adam Mosel; Shengqin Liu; Elisabeth Kremmer; Kaitlin A Goettsch; Carol Kolar; Heinz-Peter Nasheuer; Greg G Oakley
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-06-13

Review 10.  RAD51C: a novel cancer susceptibility gene is linked to Fanconi anemia and breast cancer.

Authors:  Kumar Somyajit; Shreelakshmi Subramanya; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.