Literature DB >> 23967952

The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.

Adriana A Zekveld1, Mary Rudner, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Jerker Rönnberg.   

Abstract

This study examined how semantically related information facilitates the intelligibility of spoken sentences in the presence of masking sound, and how this facilitation is influenced by masker type and by individual differences in cognitive functioning. Dutch sentences were masked by stationary noise, fluctuating noise, or an interfering talker. Each sentence was preceded by a text cue; cues were either three words that were semantically related to the sentence or three unpronounceable nonwords. Speech reception thresholds were adaptively measured. Additional measures included working memory capacity (reading span and size comparison span), linguistic closure ability (text reception threshold), and delayed sentence recognition. Word cues facilitated speech perception in noise similarly for all masker types. Cue benefit was related to reading span performance when the masker was interfering speech, but not when other maskers were used, and it did not correlate with text reception threshold or size comparison span. Better reading span performance was furthermore associated with enhanced delayed recognition of sentences preceded by word relative to nonword cues, across masker types. The results suggest that working memory capacity is associated with release from informational masking by semantically related information, and additionally with the encoding, storage, or retrieval of speech content in memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967952     DOI: 10.1121/1.4817926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

Review 1.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Daniel Fogerty; Kimberly Smith; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Musicians at the Cocktail Party: Neural Substrates of Musical Training During Selective Listening in Multispeaker Situations.

Authors:  Sebastian Puschmann; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Margaret K Miller; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.