Literature DB >> 28624645

Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise.

Kenneth I Vaden1, Susan Teubner-Rhodes2, Jayne B Ahlstrom2, Judy R Dubno2, Mark A Eckert3.   

Abstract

Correctly understood speech in difficult listening conditions is often difficult to remember. A long-standing hypothesis for this observation is that the engagement of cognitive resources to aid speech understanding can limit resources available for memory encoding. This hypothesis is consistent with evidence that speech presented in difficult conditions typically elicits greater activity throughout cingulo-opercular regions of frontal cortex that are proposed to optimize task performance through adaptive control of behavior and tonic attention. However, successful memory encoding of items for delayed recognition memory tasks is consistently associated with increased cingulo-opercular activity when perceptual difficulty is minimized. The current study used a delayed recognition memory task to test competing predictions that memory encoding for words is enhanced or limited by the engagement of cingulo-opercular activity during challenging listening conditions. An fMRI experiment was conducted with twenty healthy adult participants who performed a word identification in noise task that was immediately followed by a delayed recognition memory task. Consistent with previous findings, word identification trials in the poorer signal-to-noise ratio condition were associated with increased cingulo-opercular activity and poorer recognition memory scores on average. However, cingulo-opercular activity decreased for correctly identified words in noise that were not recognized in the delayed memory test. These results suggest that memory encoding in difficult listening conditions is poorer when elevated cingulo-opercular activity is not sustained. Although increased attention to speech when presented in difficult conditions may detract from more active forms of memory maintenance (e.g., sub-vocal rehearsal), we conclude that task performance monitoring and/or elevated tonic attention supports incidental memory encoding in challenging listening conditions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Delayed recognition memory; Frontal lobe; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Incidental memory encoding; Speech recognition in noise

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28624645      PMCID: PMC5600838          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  62 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Dana R Murphy; Fergus I M Craik; Karen Z H Li; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-06

2.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Paul C Fletcher; Ed T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: Two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses.

Authors:  Patti Adank
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  A core system for the implementation of task sets.

Authors:  Nico U F Dosenbach; Kristina M Visscher; Erica D Palmer; Francis M Miezin; Kristin K Wenger; Hyunseon C Kang; E Darcy Burgund; Ansley L Grimes; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Effects of degraded sensory input on memory for speech: behavioral data and a test of biologically constrained computational models.

Authors:  Tepring Piquado; Katheryn A Q Cousins; Arthur Wingfield; Paul Miller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory.

Authors:  P M Rabbitt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Effects of Age, Acoustic Challenge, and Verbal Working Memory on Recall of Narrative Speech.

Authors:  Caitlin M Ward; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

10.  Stop-signal task difficulty and the right inferior frontal gyrus.

Authors:  Matthew Edward Hughes; Patrick James Johnston; William Ross Fulham; Timothy William Budd; Patricia Therese Michie
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  11 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortex supports speech perception in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Arefeh Sherafati; Noel Dwyer; Aahana Bajracharya; Mahlega Samira Hassanpour; Adam T Eggebrecht; Jill B Firszt; Joseph P Culver; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Carolyn M McClaskey; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.

Authors:  Margaret A Koeritzer; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Mark A Eckert; Judy R Dubno; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Sentence predictability modulates cortical response to phonetic ambiguity.

Authors:  Hannah Mechtenberg; Xin Xie; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Brain Networks in Schizophrenia during a Working Memory Task.

Authors:  Douglass Godwin; Andrew Ji; Sridhar Kandala; Daniel Mamah
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Differences in Hearing Acuity among "Normal-Hearing" Young Adults Modulate the Neural Basis for Speech Comprehension.

Authors:  Yune S Lee; Arthur Wingfield; Nam-Eun Min; Ethan Kotloff; Murray Grossman; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-06-08

9.  Sublexical cues affect degraded speech processing: insights from fMRI.

Authors:  Arkan Al-Zubaidi; Susann Bräuer; Chris R Holdgraf; Inga M Schepers; Jochem W Rieger
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-02-16

10.  Neural modelling of the semantic predictability gain under challenging listening conditions.

Authors:  Anna Uta Rysop; Lea-Maria Schmitt; Jonas Obleser; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.