Literature DB >> 26368029

Speech-evoked ABR: Effects of age and simulated neural temporal jitter.

Sara K Mamo1, John H Grose2, Emily Buss2.   

Abstract

The speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (sABR) provides a measure of encoding complex stimuli in the brainstem, and this study employed the sABR to better understand the role of neural temporal jitter in the response patterns from older adults. In experiment 1, sABR recordings were used to investigate age-related differences in periodicity encoding of the temporal envelope and fine structure components of the response to a /da/speech token. A group of younger and a group of older adults (n = 22 per group) participated. The results demonstrated reduced amplitude of the fundamental frequency and harmonic components in the spectral domain of the recorded response of the older listeners. In experiment 2, a model of neural temporal jitter was employed to simulate in a group of young adults (n = 22) the response patterns measured from older adults. A small group of older adults (n = 7) were also tested under the jitter simulation conditions. In the young adults, the results showed a systematic reduction in the response amplitude of the most robust response components as the degree of applied jitter increased. In contrast, the older adults did not demonstrate significant response reduction when tested under jitter conditions. The overall pattern of results suggests that older adults have reduced neural synchrony for encoding periodic, complex signals at the level of the brainstem, and that this reduced synchrony can be modeled by simulating neural jitter via disruption of the temporal waveform of the stimulus.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging auditory system; Auditory temporal processing; Speech-evoked ABR (sABR)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26368029      PMCID: PMC4788984          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  37 in total

1.  Sources of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Tara Vongpaisal; Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds.

Authors:  Steven J Aiken; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The frequency following response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Anahita Mehta; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09
View more
  21 in total

1.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Top-down or bottom up: decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Srinivasa P Kommajosyula; Rui Cai; Edward Bartlett; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Alexandra L Sommer; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann C Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

9.  Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.

Authors:  Lindsey Roque; Casey Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.