Literature DB >> 29455319

Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk.

Amanda M Willis1, Sian K Smith2, Bettina Meiser2, Mandy L Ballinger3, David M Thomas3, Martin Tattersall4, Mary-Anne Young3,5.   

Abstract

Germline genomic testing is increasingly used in research to identify genetic causes of disease, including cancer. However, there is evidence that individuals who are notified of clinically actionable research findings have difficulty making informed decisions regarding uptake of genetic counseling for these findings. This study aimed to produce and pilot test a decision aid to assist participants in genomic research studies who are notified of clinically actionable research findings to make informed choices regarding uptake of genetic counseling. Development was guided by published literature, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, and the expertise of a steering committee of clinicians, researchers, and consumers. Decision aid acceptability was assessed by self-report questionnaire. All 19 participants stated that the decision aid was easy to read, clearly presented, increased their understanding of the implications of taking up research findings, and would be helpful in decision-making. While low to moderate levels of distress/worry were reported after reading the booklet, a majority of participants also reported feeling reassured. All participants would recommend the booklet to others considering uptake of clinically actionable research findings. Results indicate the decision aid is acceptable to the target audience, with potential as a useful decision support tool for genomic research participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Decision aid; Decision support; Genetic counseling; Germline genomic testing; Hereditary cancer; Notification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29455319     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0223-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  44 in total

Review 1.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; France Légaré; Krystina Lewis; Michael J Barry; Carol L Bennett; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; Richard Thomson; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-12

Review 2.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Psychosocial impact of the lack of information given at referral about familial risk for cancer.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Withdrawal from genetic counselling for cancer.

Authors:  Eveline Bleiker; Gea Wigbout; Anja van Rens; Senno Verhoef; Laura Van't Veer; Neil Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 5.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Awareness of genetic counseling and perceptions of its purpose: a survey of the Canadian public.

Authors:  Melissa Maio; Prescilla Carrion; Elyse Yaremco; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Brian Zikmund-Fisher; Peter Ubel; Aleksandra Jancovic; Todd Lucas; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-27

8.  Development and pilot testing of two decision aids for individuals considering genetic testing for cancer risk.

Authors:  Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser; Judi Homewood; Michelle Peate; Judy Kirk; Beverley Warner; Elizabeth Lobb; Clara Gaff; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.717

9.  The attitudes of people with sarcoma and their family towards genomics and incidental information arising from genetic research.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Young; Amy Herlihy; Gillian Mitchell; David M Thomas; Mandy Ballinger; Kathy Tucker; Craig R Lewis; Susan Neuhaus; Jane Halliday
Journal:  Clin Sarcoma Res       Date:  2013-07-30

10.  Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; Louise A Keogh; Jolyn Hersch; Ainsley J Newson; Phyllis Butow; Gabrielle Williams; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

1.  Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Kristin G Maki; Gratianne Vaisson; Jeanette Finderup; Krystina B Lewis; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Caroline Beaudoin; Sandrine Comeau; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.583

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.