Literature DB >> 23961983

A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation.

E Schröger1.   

Abstract

Abstract Involuntary switching to task-irrelevant sound change was studied by measuring event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and behavioral performance in a dichotic listening paradigm. Pairs of tones (S1 and S2) were presented and subjects were instructed to ignore S1 (delivered to the left ear) and to make a go/no-go response to the subsequent S2 (delivered to the right ear). On most trials, the task-irrelevant S1 was of standard frequency, but occasionally it deviated from the standard frequency either by a small or large amount. It was predicted that deviant stimuli were automatically detected and that they could involuntarily capture attention. If they lead to attention switching, less capacity should be available for the processing of target tones resulting in impaired processing of S2. As in many previous studies, deviant tones elicited the mismatch negativity (MMN), which is a component of the ERP indicating automatic change detection. Furthermore, targets preceded by a deviant tone elicited a smaller N1 wave and were detected less effectively than targets preceded by a standard tone. This impaired processing of targets following task-irrelevant changes occurred only with short S1-S2 intervals (Experiment I) but not with long ones (Experiment II). The results support a model claiming that the auditory system possesses a change detection system that monitors the acoustic input and may produce an attentional "interrupt" signal when a deviant occurs. The involuntary attentional capture caused by this signal leads to impoverished processing of closely succeeding stimuli.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 23961983     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  46 in total

1.  Reconsidering evidence for the suppression model of the octave illusion.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Jason B Mattingley; Simon A Moss
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

2.  Effects of stimulus frequency and duration on somatosensory discrimination responses.

Authors:  L A Spackman; S G Boyd; A Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Distributed cortical networks for focused auditory attention and distraction.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; Siiri Kirjavainen; Oili Salonen; Alexander Degerman; Xiaojian Kang; David L Woods; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

6.  Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-04

7.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 8.  On the Globality of Motor Suppression: Unexpected Events and Their Influence on Behavior and Cognition.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jie-Yu Lv; Ting Wang; Jiang Qiu; Si-Hai Feng; Shen Tu; Dong-Tao Wei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.