Literature DB >> 23913121

Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?

János Horváth1.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer unique insights into processes related to involuntary attention changes triggered by rare, unpredictably occurring sensory events, that is, distraction. Contrasting ERPs elicited by distracters and frequent standard stimuli in oddball paradigms allowed the formulation of a three-stage model describing distraction-related processing: first, the distracting event is highlighted by a sensory filter. Second, attention is oriented towards the event, and finally, the task-optimal attention set is restored, or task priorities are changed. Although this model summarizes how distracting stimulus information is processed, not much is known about the cost of taking this exceptional route of processing. The present study demonstrates the impact of distraction on sensory processing. Participants performed a Go/NoGo tone-duration discrimination task, with infrequent pitch distracters. In the two parts of the experiment the duration-response mapping was reversed. Contrasts of distracter and standard ERPs revealed higher P3a- and reorienting negativity amplitudes for short than for long tones, independently from response type. To understand the cause of these asymmetries, short vs. long ERP contrasts were calculated. The ERP pattern showed that short standards elicited an attention-dependent offset response, which was abolished for short distracters. That is, the apparent P3a- and RON enhancements were caused by the removal of a task-related attentional sensory enhancement. This shows that the disruption of task-optimal attention set precedes the elicitation of the P3a, which suggests that P3a does not reflect a process driving the initial distraction-related attention change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23913121     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0507-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  34 in total

1.  Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

Authors:  Urte Roeber; Stefan Berti; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300.

Authors:  Joseph Dien; Kevin M Spencer; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Distraction and facilitation--two faces of the same coin?

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Jane V Elsley; Jessica K Ljungberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-24

5.  Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction.

Authors:  Urte Roeber; Stefan Berti; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-02

6.  The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information.

Authors:  Jessica K Ljungberg; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Alicia Leiva; Nuria Vega
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

Authors:  M R Nuwer; G Comi; R Emerson; A Fuglsang-Frederiksen; J M Guérit; H Hinrichs; A Ikeda; F J Luccas; P Rappelsburger
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-03

8.  Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.

Authors:  Biqin Li; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2013

9.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.

Authors:  János Horváth; István Czigler; Emma Birkás; István Winkler; Judit Gervai
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  3 in total

1.  Editorial for special issue: "auditory attention: merging paradigms and perspectives".

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-18

2.  Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Authors:  Caroline Max; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeremy T Nelson; Jaelle Scheuerman; Kristen B Venable; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.348

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.