Literature DB >> 23960557

Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review.

Elie E Daou1.   

Abstract

A plethora of attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures is currently available often without evidence-based support. Technical aspects are now parameters considered when choosing the appropriate attachment. Despite the increasing use of the Locator attachments, studies regarding their properties remain scarce. Peer reviewed articles published in English up to 2011, were identified through a MEDLINE search (Pubmed and Elsevier) and a hand search of relevant textbooks and annual publications. Emphasis was made on the technical complications as well as the loss of retention related to the attachments in implant-retained overdentures, primarily the Locator attachment. The evaluation of the long-term outcome of implant overdentures and complications associated with different attachment systems may provide useful guidelines for the clinician in selecting the type of attachment system and overdenture design.

Keywords:  Mandibular overdentures; Prosthetic complications; Stud attachments

Year:  2013        PMID: 23960557      PMCID: PMC3723078          DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Dent J        ISSN: 1013-9052


  91 in total

1.  In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments.

Authors:  O Fromentin; B Picard; B Tavernier
Journal:  Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent       Date:  1999-04

2.  Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.

Authors:  Vicki C Petropoulos; Woollcott Smith
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Wear simulation effects on overdenture stud attachments.

Authors:  Vygandas Rutkunas; Hiroshi Mizutani; Hidekazu Takahashi; Naohiko Iwasaki
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Influence of the lubricant and the alloy on the wear behaviour of attachments.

Authors:  Stefan Bayer; Ludger Keilig; Dominik Kraus; Manfred Grüner; Helmut Stark; Sebastian Mues; Norbert Enkling
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.

Authors:  Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção; Lucas Fernando Tabata; Juliana Aparecida Delben; Erica Alves Gomes; Edson Antonio Capello de Sousa; Eduardo Passos Rocha
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  [Locator or ball attachment: a guide for clinical decision making].

Authors:  Adrian E Büttel; Nico M Bühler; Carlo P Marinello
Journal:  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed       Date:  2009

7.  Investigation of the wear of prefabricated attachments--an in vitro study of retention forces and fitting tolerances.

Authors:  Stefan Bayer; Manfred Grüner; Ludger Keilig; Robert Hültenschmidt; Claudia Nicolay; Christoph Bourauel; Karl-Heinz Utz; Helmut Stark
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.

Authors:  Vicki C Petropoulos; Francis K Mante
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Mandibular two-implant overdentures: three-year prosthodontic maintenance using the locator attachment system.

Authors:  Andrew Mackie; Karl Lyons; W Murray Thomson; Alan G T Payne
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joanne N Walton; Michael I MacEntee; Ned Glick
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.