Literature DB >> 19553853

Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.

Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão1, Wirley Gonçalves Assunção, Lucas Fernando Tabata, Juliana Aparecida Delben, Erica Alves Gomes, Edson Antonio Capello de Sousa, Eduardo Passos Rocha.   

Abstract

This finite element analysis compared stress distribution on complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. Four models of edentulous mandible were constructed: group A (control), complete denture; group B, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip system; group C, overdenture retained by 2 unsplinted implants with o'ring system; and group D, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip and 2 distally placed o'ring system. Evaluation was performed on Ansys software, with 100-N vertical load applied on central incisive teeth. The lowest maximum general stress value (in megapascal) was observed in group A (64.305) followed by groups C (119.006), D (258.650), and B (349.873). The same trend occurred in supporting tissues with the highest stress value for cortical bone. Unsplinted implants associated with the o'ring attachment system showed the lowest maximum stress values among all overdenture groups. Furthermore, o'ring system also improved stress distribution when associated with bar-clip system.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19553853     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2013-02-06

2.  Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.

Authors:  Zeynep Gümrükçü; Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Stress-strain distribution at bone-implant interface of two splinted overdenture systems using 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mostafa Omran Hussein
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Finite element analysis on stress distribution of maxillary implant-retained overdentures depending on the Bar attachment design and palatal coverage.

Authors:  Min-Jeong Kim; Sung-Ok Hong
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 5.  Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

6.  Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study.

Authors:  Soumyadev Satpathy; C L Satish Babu; Shilpa Shetty; Bharat Raj
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

7.  Finite element analysis of stress distribution around short and long implants in mandibular overdenture treatment.

Authors:  Yeghaneh Memari; Parisa Fattahi; Amir Fattahi; Solmaz Eskandarion; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-01-21

Review 8.  Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis - A systematic review.

Authors:  Bappaditya Bhattacharjee; Ritu Saneja; Ankita Singh; Pavan Kumar Dubey; Atul Bhatnagar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-09-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.