Literature DB >> 23946325

Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels.

Lydia F Emery1, Daniel Romer, Kaitlin M Sheerin, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Ellen Peters.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to select graphic warning labels for cigarette packs has been challenged as inadequate for demonstrating effects on smokers' beliefs about smoking. The present study tested the prediction that warnings alter risk perceptions and thoughts of quitting indirectly through a cognitive pathway (warning believability) and an affective pathway (worry about health), both of which are important for encouraging smokers to consider quitting.
METHODS: Using a national Internet panel, individuals who smoke were randomly assigned to view 1 of 3 types of warning labels: basic text only, graphic image with basic text, and graphic image with both basic and additional text elaborating on the reason for the health risk. Analyses were conducted to determine whether cognitive and affective reactions mediated effects on smoking-related outcomes.
RESULTS: Images influenced perceived risk, immediate desire to smoke, and feelings toward quitting indirectly through affective reactions; elaborated text influenced these outcomes through cognitive believability, with little evidence of direct effects. Believability also enhanced positive feelings toward quitting among smokers who were less worried about health risks due to smoking.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that (a) many effects of warnings on smokers' beliefs are mediated rather than direct, (b) both cognitive and affective responses are important mediators, and (c) elaborated text can help to increase effects of images through a cognitive pathway. Warning labels should be designed to maximize effects on these mediators in order to influence smoking outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946325      PMCID: PMC3920332          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  17 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

Authors:  Bertram Gawronski; Galen V Bodenhausen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Pete Driezen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Romer; Paul Slovic; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Leisha Wharfield; C K Mertz; Stephanie M Carpenter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

6.  Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents' smoking-related beliefs and behaviours?

Authors:  Victoria White; Bernice Webster; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 7.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.

Authors:  S Epstein
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1994-08

8.  Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey.

Authors:  Crawford Moodie; Anne Marie MacKintosh; Dave Hammond
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Graphic imagery is not sufficient for increased attention to cigarette warnings: the role of text captions.

Authors:  Kyle G Brown; John G Reidy; Anna R Weighall; Madelynne A Arden
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Desire versus efficacy in smokers' paradoxical reactions to pictorial health warnings for cigarettes.

Authors:  Daniel Romer; Ellen Peters; Andrew A Strasser; Daniel Langleben
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  56 in total

1.  Understanding Why Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Quit Attempts.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Humberto Parada; Marissa G Hall; Marcella H Boynton; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Do Emotions Spark Interest in Alternative Tobacco Products?

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Jiyeon So; Angeline Sangalang; Torsten B Neilands; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2017-01-10

3.  The Effect of Graphic Warnings on Sugary-Drink Purchasing.

Authors:  Grant E Donnelly; Laura Y Zatz; Dan Svirsky; Leslie K John
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-18

4.  Temporal Effects of Message Congruency on Attention to and Recall of Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigarette Packages.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; E Paul Wileyto; Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Jordan Z Burdge; Kathy Z Tang; Joseph N Cappella; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Framing Indoor Tanning Warning Messages to Reduce Skin Cancer Risks Among Young Women: Implications for Research and Policy.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The role of negative affect and message credibility in perceived effectiveness of smokeless tobacco health warning labels in Navi Mumbai, India and Dhaka, Bangladesh: A moderated-mediation analysis.

Authors:  Seema Mutti-Packer; Jessica L Reid; James F Thrasher; Daniel Romer; Geoffrey T Fong; Prakash C Gupta; Mangesh S Pednekar; Nigar Nargis; David Hammond
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Independent or synergistic? Effects of varying size and using pictorial images in tobacco health warning labels.

Authors:  Chris Skurka; Motasem Kalaji; Michael C Dorf; Deena Kemp; Amelia Greiner Safi; Sahara Byrne; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Addiction Treatment Clients' Reactions to Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs.

Authors:  Anna Pagano; Noah Gubner; Barbara Tajima; Deborah Yip; Catherine Henderson; Joseph Guydish
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2017-03-20

9.  Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; Melissa Mercincavage; Kathy Z Tang; C Dana Tomlin; Joseph N Cappella; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Responses to Graphic Warning Labels among Low-income Smokers.

Authors:  Toshali Katyal; Arturo Durazo; Marlena Hartman-Filson; Maya Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.