Rosalie V Caruso1, Brian V Fix1, James F Thrasher2, K Michael Cummings3, Geoffrey T Fong4, W E Stephens5, Richard J O'Connor1. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY. 2. University of South Carolina, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Columbia, SC. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, St. Andrews University, Scotland, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The current study examines physical cigarette design characteristics and tobacco metal content of cigarettes obtained from 5 countries to determine how these properties vary for cigarette brands, both within and across countries with different dominant manufacturers. METHODS: Cigarette packs were collected from International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (ITC) participants in the U.S., the U.K., Mauritius, Mexico, and Thailand. Cigarettes were assessed for physical and design properties (eg, ventilation, pressure drop, rod density, weight) by published methods, and for metal content (As, Cd, Ni, Pb) by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. RESULTS: Significant differences in cigarette design and toxic metal concentrations were observed between countries and between manufacturers within countries. Filter ventilation, which is strongly predictive of machine-measured tar and nicotine levels, varied most widely across countries. Ni and Cd were highest in Thailand (2.23ug/g and 1.64ug/g, respectively); As was highest in Mexico (0.29ug/g) and Pb was highest in the U.K. (0.43 ug/g). CONCLUSIONS: Parties to the FCTC should consider the adoption of uniform product standards related to cigarette design, emissions, and tobacco content that would reduce population health risks.
OBJECTIVES: The current study examines physical cigarette design characteristics and tobacco metal content of cigarettes obtained from 5 countries to determine how these properties vary for cigarette brands, both within and across countries with different dominant manufacturers. METHODS: Cigarette packs were collected from International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (ITC) participants in the U.S., the U.K., Mauritius, Mexico, and Thailand. Cigarettes were assessed for physical and design properties (eg, ventilation, pressure drop, rod density, weight) by published methods, and for metal content (As, Cd, Ni, Pb) by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. RESULTS: Significant differences in cigarette design and toxic metal concentrations were observed between countries and between manufacturers within countries. Filter ventilation, which is strongly predictive of machine-measured tar and nicotine levels, varied most widely across countries. Ni and Cd were highest in Thailand (2.23ug/g and 1.64ug/g, respectively); As was highest in Mexico (0.29ug/g) and Pb was highest in the U.K. (0.43 ug/g). CONCLUSIONS: Parties to the FCTC should consider the adoption of uniform product standards related to cigarette design, emissions, and tobacco content that would reduce population health risks.
Authors: Julio C Campuzano; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila; Maritta S Jaakkola; Eduardo Lazcano Ponce; Pablo Kuri Morales; Pablo Bautista; Neal L Benowitz; Marion Ceraso; Amanda Blackford; Jonathan M Samet Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Brian V Fix; Richard O'Connor; David Hammond; Bill King; Ann McNeill; James Thrasher; Marcelo Boado; K Michael Cummings; Hua-Hie Yong; Mary E Thompson; Andrew Hyland Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Brian V Fix; Andrew Hyland; Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Frank J Chaloupka; Andrea S Licht Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: James F Thrasher; Erika N Abad-Vivero; Liling Huang; Richard J O'Connor; David Hammond; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; Barry Markovsky; James Hardin Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2015-05-31 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: D M Burns; E Dybing; N Gray; S Hecht; C Anderson; T Sanner; R O'Connor; M Djordjevic; C Dresler; P Hainaut; M Jarvis; A Opperhuizen; K Straif Journal: Tob Control Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 7.552