Literature DB >> 25352560

Changes in tar yields and cigarette design in samples of Chinese cigarettes, 2009 and 2012.

Liane M Schneller1, Benjamin A Zwierzchowski1, Rosalie V Caruso1, Qiang Li2, Jiang Yuan3, Geoffrey T Fong4, Richard J O'Connor1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: China is home to the greatest number of smokers as well as the greatest number of smoking-related deaths. An active and growing market of cigarettes marketed as 'light' or 'low tar' may keep health-concerned smokers from quitting, wrongly believing that such brands are less harmful.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to observe changes in cigarette design characteristics and reported tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide (TNCO) levels in a sample of cigarette brands obtained in seven Chinese cities from 2009 to 2012.
METHODS: Cigarettes were purchased and shipped to Roswell Park Cancer Institute, where 91 pairs of packs were selected for physical cigarette design characteristic testing and recording of TNCO values. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS, and was initially characterised using descriptive statistics, correlations and generalised estimating equations to observe changes in brand varieties over time.
FINDINGS: Reported TNCO values on packs saw mean tar, nicotine and CO levels decrease from 2009 to 2012 by 7.9%, 4.5% and 6.0%, respectively. Ventilation was the only cigarette design feature that significantly changed over time (p<0.001), with an increase of 31.7%. Significant predictors of tar and CO yield overall were ventilation and per-cigarette tobacco weight, while for nicotine tobacco moisture was also an independent predictor of yield.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of ventilation to decrease TNCO emissions is misleading smokers to believe that they are smoking a 'light/low' tar cigarette that is healthier, and is potentially forestalling the quitting behaviours that would begin to reduce the health burden of tobacco in China, and so should be prohibited. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low/Middle income country; Public policy; Surveillance and monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25352560      PMCID: PMC4693290          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  16 in total

1.  Massachusetts' advertising against light cigarettes appears to change beliefs and behavior.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; B Yost; M M Stine; C Celebucki
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  How did UK cigarette makers reduce tar to 10 mg or less?

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Gary A Giovino; Ann McNeill; Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-04

3.  How do different cigarette design features influence the standard tar yields of popular cigarette brands sold in different countries?

Authors:  R J O'Connor; D Hammond; A McNeill; B King; L T Kozlowski; G A Giovino; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Filter ventilation and nicotine content of tobacco in cigarettes from Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; N Y Mehta; C T Sweeney; S S Schwartz; G P Vogler; M J Jarvis; R J West
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; N A Dreschel; S D Stellman; J Wilkenfeld; E B Weiss; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Chinese 'low-tar' cigarettes do not deliver lower levels of nicotine and carcinogens.

Authors:  Quan Gan; Wei Lu; Jiying Xu; Xinjian Li; Maciej Goniewicz; Neal L Benowitz; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Cigarettes sold in China: design, emissions and metals.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Qiang Li; W Edryd Stephens; David Hammond; Tara Elton-Marshall; K Michael Cummings; Gary A Giovino; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Tobacco industry response to public health concern: a content analysis of cigarette ads.

Authors:  K E Warner
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1985

9.  Health knowledge and perception of risks among Chinese smokers and non-smokers: findings from the Wave 1 ITC China Survey.

Authors:  Jilan Yang; David Hammond; Pete Driezen; Geoffrey T Fong; Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Marketing 'less harmful, low-tar' cigarettes is a key strategy of the industry to counter tobacco control in China.

Authors:  Gonghuan Yang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  4 in total

1.  Toxic metal and nicotine content of cigarettes sold in China, 2009 and 2012.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Liane M Schneller; Rosalie V Caruso; W Edryd Stephens; Qiang Li; Jiang Yuan; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Smokers' sensory beliefs mediate the relation between smoking a light/low tar cigarette and perceptions of harm.

Authors:  Tara Elton-Marshall; Geoffrey T Fong; Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; Steve Shaowei Xu; Anne C K Quah; Guoze Feng; Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Risk perceptions and continued smoking as a function of cigarette filter ventilation level among US youth and young adults who smoke.

Authors:  Dana Mowls Carroll; Katelyn M Tessier; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Sarah Reisinger; Peter G Shields; Irina S Stepanov; Xianghua Luo; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Vaughan W Rees
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.953

4.  Impact of Cigarette Filter Ventilation on U.S. Smokers' Perceptions and Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm.

Authors:  Dana M Carroll; Irina Stepanov; Richard O'Connor; Xianghua Luo; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Warren K Bickel; Micah L Berman; David L Ashley; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Peter G Shields; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.