Thomas M Casey1, Piotr K Grzyska, Robert P Hausinger, John McCracken. 1. Department of Chemistry, ‡Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University , East Lansing, Michigan, 48824.
Abstract
The position and orientation of taurine near the non-heme Fe(II) center of the α-ketoglutarate (α-KG)-dependent taurine hydroxylase (TauD) was measured using Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation (ESEEM) spectroscopy. TauD solutions containing Fe(II), α-KG, and natural abundance taurine or specifically deuterated taurine were prepared anaerobically and treated with nitric oxide (NO) to make an S = 3/2 {FeNO}(7) complex that is suitable for robust analysis with EPR spectroscopy. Using ratios of ESEEM spectra collected for TauD samples having natural abundance taurine or deuterated taurine, (1)H and (14)N modulations were filtered out of the spectra and interactions with specific deuterons on taurine could be studied separately. The Hamiltonian parameters used to calculate the amplitudes and line shapes of frequency spectra containing isolated deuterium ESEEM were obtained with global optimization algorithms. Additional statistical analysis was performed to validate the interpretation of the optimized parameters. The strongest (2)H hyperfine coupling was to a deuteron on the C1 position of taurine and was characterized by an effective dipolar distance of 3.90 ± 0.25 Å from the {FeNO}(7) paramagnetic center. The principal axes of this C1-(2)H hyperfine coupling and nuclear quadrupole interaction tensors were found to make angles of 26 ± 5 and 52 ± 17°, respectively, with the principal axis of the {FeNO}(7) zero-field splitting tensor. These results are discussed within the context of the orientation of substrate taurine prior to the initiation of hydrogen abstraction.
The position and orientation of taurinenear the non-n class="Chemical">hemeFe(II) center of the α-ketoglutarate (α-KG)-dependent taurine hydroxylase (TauD) was measured using Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation (ESEEM) spectroscopy. TauD solutions containing Fe(II), α-KG, and natural abundance taurine or specifically deuterated taurine were prepared anaerobically and treated with nitric oxide (NO) to make an S = 3/2 {FeNO}(7) complex that is suitable for robust analysis with EPR spectroscopy. Using ratios of ESEEM spectra collected for TauD samples having natural abundance taurine or deuterated taurine, (1)H and (14)N modulations were filtered out of the spectra and interactions with specific deuterons on taurine could be studied separately. The Hamiltonian parameters used to calculate the amplitudes and line shapes of frequency spectra containing isolated deuterium ESEEM were obtained with global optimization algorithms. Additional statistical analysis was performed to validate the interpretation of the optimized parameters. The strongest (2)H hyperfine coupling was to a deuteron on the C1 position of taurine and was characterized by an effective dipolar distance of 3.90 ± 0.25 Å from the {FeNO}(7) paramagnetic center. The principal axes of this C1-(2)H hyperfine coupling and nuclear quadrupole interaction tensors were found to make angles of 26 ± 5 and 52 ± 17°, respectively, with the principal axis of the {FeNO}(7) zero-field splitting tensor. These results are discussed within the context of the orientation of substrate taurine prior to the initiation of hydrogen abstraction.
Authors: E I Solomon; T C Brunold; M I Davis; J N Kemsley; S K Lee; N Lehnert; F Neese; A J Skulan; Y S Yang; J Zhou Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2000-01-12 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Michael L Neidig; Andrea Decker; Oliver W Choroba; Fanglu Huang; Michael Kavana; Graham R Moran; Jonathan B Spencer; Edward I Solomon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-08-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jonathan M Elkins; Matthew J Ryle; Ian J Clifton; Julie C Dunning Hotopp; John S Lloyd; Nicolai I Burzlaff; Jack E Baldwin; Robert P Hausinger; Peter L Roach Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2002-04-23 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Zhihong Zhang; Jing shan Ren; Karl Harlos; Colin H McKinnon; Ian J Clifton; Christopher J Schofield Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2002-04-24 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Marcus D Hanwell; Donald E Curtis; David C Lonie; Tim Vandermeersch; Eva Zurek; Geoffrey R Hutchison Journal: J Cheminform Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 5.514
Authors: Noah P Dunham; Wei-Chen Chang; Andrew J Mitchell; Ryan J Martinie; Bo Zhang; Jonathan A Bergman; Lauren J Rajakovich; Bo Wang; Alexey Silakov; Carsten Krebs; Amie K Boal; J Martin Bollinger Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Anwesha Goswami; Xiaodong Liu; Wenlong Cai; Thomas P Wyche; Tim S Bugni; Maïa Meurillon; Suzanne Peyrottes; Christian Perigaud; Koichi Nonaka; Jürgen Rohr; Steven G Van Lanen Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Ryan J Martinie; Jovan Livada; Wei-chen Chang; Michael T Green; Carsten Krebs; J Martin Bollinger; Alexey Silakov Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 15.419