Literature DB >> 23935707

Impulse response and Modulation Transfer Function analysis for Shift-And-Add and Back Projection image reconstruction algorithms in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).

Ying Chen1, Joseph Y Lo, James T Dobbins.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is second only to lung cancer as the leading cause of non-preventable cancer death in women. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is a promising technique to improve early breast cancer detection. In this paper, we present the impulse response and Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) analysis to quantitatively compare Shift-And-Add (SAA) and point-by-point Back Projection (BP) three-dimensional image reconstruction algorithms in DBT. A Filtered Back Projection (FBP) deblurring algorithm based on point-by-point BP was used to demonstrate deblurred tomosynthesis images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BP; Back Projection; FBP; Filtered Back Projection; MTF; Modulation Transfer Function; SAA; Shift-And-Add; impulse response; mammography; tomosynthesis

Year:  2008        PMID: 23935707      PMCID: PMC3738212          DOI: 10.1504/IJFIPM.2008.020187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Funct Inform Personal Med        ISSN: 1756-2104


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; S P Baker; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S P Baker; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Optimization of the matrix inversion tomosynthesis (MITS) impulse response and modulation transfer function characteristics for chest imaging.

Authors:  Devon J Godfrey; H P McAdams; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Ge; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Digital tomosynthesis of hand joints for arthritis assessment.

Authors:  J Duryea; J T Dobbins; J A Lynch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Alexander Stewart; Martin Stanton; Thomas McCauley; Walter Phillips; Daniel B Kopans; Richard H Moore; Jeffrey W Eberhard; Beale Opsahl-Ong; Loren Niklason; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Joseph Y Lo; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.