Literature DB >> 23930983

AMIGAS: building a cervical cancer screening intervention for public health practice.

Judith Lee Smith1, Katherine M Wilson, Carlyn E Orians, Theresa L Byrd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many barriers to cervical cancer screening for Hispanic women have been documented, but few effective interventions exist. The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends increasing cervical cancer screening through various methods. Building on this evidence, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the research and testing phases for an evidence-based and theoretically grounded intervention designed to increase cervical cancer screening among never and rarely screened Hispanic women of Mexican descent. In this article, we describe the development process of the AMIGAS (Ayudando a las Mujeres con Información, Guía, y Amor para su Salud) intervention, highlight the integration of scientific evidence and community-based participatory research principles, and identify opportunities for dissemination, adaptation, and implementation of this intervention.
METHODS: The AMIGAS team was a collaboration among researchers, promotoras (community health workers), and program administrators. The multiyear, multiphase project was conducted in Houston, Texas; El Paso, Texas; and Yakima, Washington. The team completed several rounds of formative research, designed intervention materials and methodology, conducted a randomized controlled trial, created a guide for program administrators, and developed an intervention dissemination plan.
RESULTS: Trial results demonstrated that AMIGAS was successful in increasing cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Adaptation of AMIGAS showed minimal reduction of outcomes. Dissemination efforts are underway to make AMIGAS available in a downloadable format via the Internet.
CONCLUSIONS: Developing a community-based intervention that is evidence-based and theoretically grounded is challenging, time-intensive, and requires collaboration among multiple disciplines. Inclusion of key stakeholders-in particular program deliverers and administrators-and planning for dissemination and translation to practice are integral components of successful intervention design. By providing explicit directions for adaptation for program deliverers, relevant information for program administrators, and access to the intervention via the Internet, AMIGAS is available to help increase cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women and other women disproportionately affected by cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23930983      PMCID: PMC4603539          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  28 in total

1.  Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy.

Authors:  D W Baker; M V Williams; R M Parker; J A Gazmararian; J Nurss
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-09

2.  Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women.

Authors:  Theresa L Byrd; Susan K Peterson; Rafaelita Chavez; Andrea Heckert
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Using intervention mapping as a participatory strategy: development of a cervical cancer screening intervention for Hispanic women.

Authors:  Theresa L Byrd; Katherine M Wilson; Judith Lee Smith; Andrea Heckert; Carlyn E Orians; Sally W Vernon; Maria E Fernandez-Esquer; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  A Promotora-administered group education intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening in a rural community along the U.S.-Mexico border: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tomas Nuño; Maria Elena Martinez; Robin Harris; Francisco García
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Cervical cancer screening in the United States, 1993-2010: characteristics of women who are never screened.

Authors:  Han-Yang Chen; Courtenay L Kessler; Naoyo Mori; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Briana Lawrence; Randy Elder; Shawna L Mercer; Katherine M Wilson; Barbara DeVinney; Stephanie Melillo; Michelle Carvalho; Stephen Taplin; Roshan Bastani; Barbara K Rimer; Sally W Vernon; Cathy Lee Melvin; Vicky Taylor; Maria Fernandez; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Health care reform and women's insurance coverage for breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Alice R Levy; Brian K Bruen; Leighton Ku
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  5 in total

1.  A profile of Mexican-born women who adhere to national cervical cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Christina M Hernández; Debra Wallace
Journal:  J Community Health Nurs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.974

2.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among Hispanic subgroups in the USA: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 2008, 2010, and 2013.

Authors:  Meredith L Shoemaker; Mary C White
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs About Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals in Low-Income Women After an Educational Intervention.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Vicki B Benard; April Greek; Nikki A Hawkins; Lavinia Lin
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-01-13

Review 4.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

5.  General practitioners can increase participation in cervical cancer screening - a model program in Hungary.

Authors:  Anikó Gyulai; Attila Nagy; Vera Pataki; Dóra Tonté; Róza Ádány; Zoltán Vokó
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.