Literature DB >> 14715211

Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women.

Theresa L Byrd1, Susan K Peterson, Rafaelita Chavez, Andrea Heckert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined beliefs, attitudes, and personal characteristics that correlated with self-reported cervical cancer screening history among Hispanic women aged 18 to 25 years old in El Paso, TX, a large metropolitan area on the U.S.-Mexico border.
METHODS: Data were collected through a cross-sectional, face-to-face survey. The study questionnaire was based primarily on the Health Belief Model, and included scales that measured perceived susceptibility and seriousness of cervical cancer, and perceived benefits and barriers to Pap test screening. The study questionnaire also included measures of acculturation, Pap test history, pregnancy and sexual history, use of birth control, type of medical insurance, and educational attainment.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent reported ever having had a Pap test and 56% reported having had a test in the past year. Eighty percent reported that they were sexually active, and of these, 63% reported using birth control. Respondents understood the seriousness of cervical cancer, their susceptibility to cervical cancer, and the benefits of Pap testing; however, only 61% agreed that most young women whom they know have Pap tests. Greater acculturation and the belief that most young unmarried women have Pap tests were positively associated with ever having screening. The perception that the test would be painful and not knowing where to go for the test were negatively associated with ever having a Pap test.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found suboptimal rates of screening for cervical cancer in a sample of young Hispanic women residing along the U.S.-Mexico border. Although women may understand the seriousness of cervical cancer and the benefits of screening, perceptions about Pap tests may pose barriers to undergoing screening. Efforts to increase screening also may need to focus specifically on women who are least acculturated, as they also were least likely to have had prior Pap tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14715211     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  45 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Increasing cervical cancer screening in the United States-Mexico border region.

Authors:  Beti Thompson; Hugo Vilchis; Crystal Moran; Wade Copeland; Sarah Holte; Catherine Duggan
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Vulnerability and unmet health care needs. The influence of multiple risk factors.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; Gregory D Stevens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Cervical cancer screening in Kolkata, India: beliefs and predictors of cervical cancer screening among women attending a women's health clinic in Kolkata, India.

Authors:  Brita Roy; Tricia S Tang
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices for cervical cancer screening among the Bhutanese refugee community in Omaha, Nebraska.

Authors:  Rebecca J Haworth; Ruth Margalit; Christine Ross; Tikka Nepal; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-10

6.  Beliefs about cervical cancer screening among Turkish married women.

Authors:  Melek Nihal Esin; Serap Bulduk; Aysun Ardic
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  "Doctor, what do i have?" Knowledge of cancer diagnosis among immigrant/migrant minorities.

Authors:  Francesca Gany; Lalanthica Yogendran; Dana Massie; Julia Ramirez; Trevor Lee; Gary Winkel; Lisa Diamond; Jennifer Leng
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.

Authors:  Alejandro G Hughes; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway; Paulette Schnell; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

9.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks.

Authors:  Armando Valdez; Anna M Napoles; Susan L Stewart; Alvaro Garza
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Avoidable tragedies: Disparities in healthcare access among medically underserved women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lois M Ramondetta; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen M Schmeler; Maria E Daheri; Jessica Gallegos; Michael Scheurer; Jane R Montealegre; Andrea Milbourne; Matthew L Anderson; Charlotte C Sun
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.