Literature DB >> 23090560

ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: Screening for cervical cancer.

.   

Abstract

The incidence of cervical cancer in the United States has decreased more than 50% in the past 30 years because of widespread screening with cervical cytology. In 1975, the rate was 14.8 per 100,000 women. By 2008, it had been reduced to 6.6 per 100,000 women. Mortality from the disease has undergone a similar decrease from 5.55 per 100,000 women in 1975 to 2.38 per 100,000 women in 2008 (1). The American Cancer Society (ACS) estimates that there will be 12,170 new cases of cervical cancer in the United States in 2012, with 4,220 deaths from the disease (2). Cervical cancer is much more common worldwide, particularly in countries without screening programs, with an estimated 530,000 new cases of the disease and 275,000 resultant deaths each year (3, 4). When cervical cancer screening programs have been introduced into communities, marked reductions in cervical cancer incidence have followed (5, 6). New technologies for cervical cancer screening continue to evolve as do recommendations for managing the results. In addition, there are different risk-benefit considerations for women at different ages, as reflected in age-specific screening recommendations. The ACS, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) have recently updated their joint guidelines for cervical cancer screening (7), and an update to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations also has been issued (8). The purpose of this document is to provide a review of the best available evidence regarding screening for cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23090560     DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318277c92a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  110 in total

1.  Cervical screening and cervical cancer death among older women: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Alison S Rustagi; Aruna Kamineni; Sheila Weinmann; Susan D Reed; Polly Newcomb; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Excess Cost of Cervical Cancer Screening Beyond Recommended Screening Ages or After Hysterectomy in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Gretchen Hultman; McKenzie DeKam; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Levi S Downs; Melissa A Geller; Chap Le; Genevieve Melton; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.

Authors:  Nathan Kow; Howard B Goldman; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Patient knowledge and beliefs as barriers to extending cervical cancer screening intervals in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Nikki A Hawkins; Vicki B Benard; April Greek; Katherine B Roland; Diane Manninen; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 5.  Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Testing: the Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Roles of Health Care Providers and Patients in Initiation of Unnecessary Papanicolaou Testing After Total Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Human papillomavirus in the HIV-infected host: epidemiology and pathogenesis in the antiretroviral era.

Authors:  Cristina Brickman; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.071

8.  Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals Preferred by U.S. Women.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Cervical Cancer Screening-Moving From the Value of Evidence to the Evidence of Value.

Authors:  George F Sawaya
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Public health national approach to reducing breast and cervical cancer disparities.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Marcus Plescia; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.