Tomas Nuño1, Maria Elena Martinez, Robin Harris, Francisco García. 1. The Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin A250, PO Box 245209, Tucson, AZ 85724-5209, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common neoplasm among Hispanic women. Cervical cancer has a higher incidence and mortality among Hispanic women compared with non-Hispanic White women. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a promotora-administered educational intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among post-reproductive age, medically underserved Hispanic women residing along the U.S.-Mexico border. METHODS:Women age 50 or older were eligible to participate in this intervention study. A total of 381 subjects agreed to participate. Women were randomly assigned into one of two groups, educational intervention or usual care. The primary outcomes were self-reported mammogram and Pap smear screening. Logistic regression analysis was used to compute odds ratios for comparisons between intervention and control groups. RESULTS: Women in the intervention group were 2.0 times more likely to report having had a mammogram within the last year when compared with the usual care group (95% CI = 1.3-3.1). Likewise, women in the intervention group were 1.5 times more likely to report having a Pap smear within the last year when compared with the usual care group, although this was not statistically significant (95% CI = 0.9-2.6). In a secondary analysis, the intervention suggests a stronger effect on those that had not had a mammogram or Pap smear within the past year at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A promotora-based educational intervention can be used to increase breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among Hispanic women.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer is the most common neoplasm among Hispanic women. Cervical cancer has a higher incidence and mortality among Hispanic women compared with non-Hispanic White women. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a promotora-administered educational intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among post-reproductive age, medically underserved Hispanic women residing along the U.S.-Mexico border. METHODS:Women age 50 or older were eligible to participate in this intervention study. A total of 381 subjects agreed to participate. Women were randomly assigned into one of two groups, educational intervention or usual care. The primary outcomes were self-reported mammogram and Pap smear screening. Logistic regression analysis was used to compute odds ratios for comparisons between intervention and control groups. RESULTS:Women in the intervention group were 2.0 times more likely to report having had a mammogram within the last year when compared with the usual care group (95% CI = 1.3-3.1). Likewise, women in the intervention group were 1.5 times more likely to report having a Pap smear within the last year when compared with the usual care group, although this was not statistically significant (95% CI = 0.9-2.6). In a secondary analysis, the intervention suggests a stronger effect on those that had not had a mammogram or Pap smear within the past year at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A promotora-based educational intervention can be used to increase breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among Hispanic women.
Authors: Sheila F Castañeda; Rebeca E Giacinto; Elizabeth A Medeiros; Ilana Brongiel; Olga Cardona; Patricia Perez; Gregory A Talavera Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2015-05-28
Authors: Beti Thompson; Wendy E Barrington; Katherine J Briant; Erin Kupay; Elizabeth Carosso; Nora E Gonzalez; Virginia J Gonzalez Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: José A Pagán; Cynthia J Brown; David A Asch; Katrina Armstrong; Elena Bastida; Carmen Guerra Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Vivian Colón-López; Daisy González; Camille Vélez; Natalie Fernández-Espada; Alana Feldman-Soler; Kelly Ayala-Escobar; Alelí M Ayala-Marín; Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; William A Calo; Angela Pattatucci-Aragón; Marinilda Rivera-Díaz; María E Fernández Journal: P R Health Sci J Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 0.705
Authors: Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford; Dale McLerran; Ricardo Jimenez; Donald L Patrick; India Ornelas; Sonia Bishop; John R Scheel; Beti Thompson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Heather B Edelblute; Sandra Clark; Lilli Mann; Kathryn M McKenney; Jason J Bischof; Christine Kistler Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2014-06
Authors: Theresa L Byrd; Katherine M Wilson; Judith Lee Smith; Gloria Coronado; Sally W Vernon; Maria Eugenia Fernandez-Esquer; Beti Thompson; Melchor Ortiz; David Lairson; Maria E Fernandez Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 6.860