Literature DB >> 23928932

Magnetic resonance elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.

Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh1, Gang Wang, Seng Gee Lim, Aileen Wee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We measured the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and compared it with serum fibrosis markers.
METHODS: Prospective comparison of MRE and routine serum fibrosis markers, namely serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ALT/AST ratio (AAR), AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) and prothrombin index (PI), was performed in 63 consecutive CHB patients who underwent MRE and histological confirmation of liver fibrosis within a 6-month interval. Diagnostic performance of MRE and serum markers for staging fibrosis (≥F1), significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3) and cirrhosis (F4) was compared.
RESULTS: The study group comprised 63 patients (19 female; mean age ± SD, 50 ± 11.9 years). MRE (ρ = 0.94, P < 0.0001), APRI (ρ = 0.42, P = 0.0006), PI (ρ = 0.42, P = 0.0006) and AST (ρ = 0.28, P = 0.028) results correlated significantly with fibrosis stage. MRE was significantly more accurate than serum fibrosis markers for the detection of significant fibrosis (0.99 vs. 0.55-0.73) and cirrhosis (0.98 vs. 0.53-0.77). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values for MRE for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 97.4 %, 100 %, 100 % and 96 %, and 100 %, 95.2 %, 91.3 % and 100 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRE is an accurate non-invasive technique for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in CHB. KEY POINTS: • Magnetic resonance elastography is accurate for liver fibrosis detection and staging. • MR elastography is more accurate than serum tests for staging liver fibrosis. • MR elastography can potentially replace liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23928932     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2978-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  54 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: preliminary results and estimation of inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Katsuhiro Sano; Hironobu Sou; Ali Muhi; Tsuyota Koshiishi; Richard L Ehman; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Long-term entecavir therapy results in the reversal of fibrosis/cirrhosis and continued histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Ting-Tsung Chang; Yun-Fan Liaw; Shun-Sheng Wu; Eugene Schiff; Kwang-Hyub Han; Ching-Lung Lai; Rifaat Safadi; Samuel S Lee; Waldemar Halota; Zachary Goodman; Yun-Chan Chi; Hui Zhang; Robert Hindes; Uchenna Iloeje; Suzanne Beebe; Bruce Kreter
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness.

Authors:  Catherine D G Hines; Thorsten A Bley; Mary J Lindstrom; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  The long-term pathological evolution of chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  M Yano; H Kumada; M Kage; K Ikeda; K Shimamatsu; O Inoue; E Hashimoto; J H Lefkowitch; J Ludwig; K Okuda
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Prevalence, risk factors and causes of discordance in fibrosis staging by transient elastography and liver biopsy.

Authors:  Robert P Myers; Pam Crotty; Gilles Pomier-Layrargues; Mang Ma; Stefan J Urbanski; Magdy Elkashab
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 5.828

8.  Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography.

Authors:  Patrick Asbach; Dieter Klatt; Uwe Hamhaber; Jürgen Braun; Rajan Somasundaram; Bernd Hamm; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Authors:  Brian J McMahon
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.115

10.  Cutoff values for alcoholic liver fibrosis using magnetic resonance elastography technique.

Authors:  Sabine F Bensamoun; Gwladys E Leclerc; Laëtitia Debernard; Xiaobin Cheng; Ludovic Robert; Fabrice Charleux; Colette Rhein; Jean-Paul Latrive
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of liver cirrhosis, using diagnostic imaging tools.

Authors:  Suk Keu Yeom; Chang Hee Lee; Sang Hoon Cha; Cheol Min Park
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-18

Review 2.  Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Yoav Lurie; Muriel Webb; Ruth Cytter-Kuint; Shimon Shteingart; Gerardo Z Lederkremer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Rohit Loomba; Zhen Wang; Claude Sirlin; Jun Chen; Meng Yin; Frank H Miller; Russell N Low; Tarek Hassanein; Edmund M Godfrey; Patrick Asbach; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David J Lomas; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Progress in non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Chengxi Li; Rentao Li; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.248

5.  MR elastography in primary sclerosing cholangitis: correlating liver stiffness with bile duct strictures and parenchymal changes.

Authors:  Candice A Bookwalter; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; John E Eaton; Thomas D Smyrk; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-12

6.  Further exploration of MRI techniques for liver T1rho quantification.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jing Yuan; Min Deng; Pu-Xuan Lu; Anil T Ahuja; Yi-Xiang J Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-12

7.  Prediction of esophageal varices by liver and spleen MR elastography.

Authors:  Hayato Abe; Yutaka Midorikawa; Naoki Matsumoto; Mitsuhiko Moriyama; Kazu Shibutani; Masahiro Okada; Seiichi Udagawa; Shingo Tsuji; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Morisaka; Utaroh Motosugi; Kevin J Glaser; Shintaro Ichikawa; Richard L Ehman; Katsuhiro Sano; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.