Literature DB >> 23927332

A method to acquire CT organ dose map using OSL dosimeters and ATOM anthropomorphic phantoms.

Da Zhang1, Xinhua Li, Yiming Gao, X George Xu, Bob Liu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the design and procedure of an experimental method for acquiring densely sampled organ dose map for CT applications, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters "nanoDots" and standard ATOM anthropomorphic phantoms; and to provide the results of applying the method--a dose data set with good statistics for the comparison with Monte Carlo simulation result in the future.
METHODS: A standard ATOM phantom has densely located holes (in 3×3 cm or 1.5×1.5 cm grids), which are too small (5 mm in diameter) to host many types of dosimeters, including the nanoDots. The authors modified the conventional way in which nanoDots are used, by removing the OSL disks from the holders before inserting them inside a standard ATOM phantom for dose measurements. The authors solved three technical difficulties introduced by this modification: (1) energy dependent dose calibration for raw OSL readings; (2) influence of the brief background exposure of OSL disks to dimmed room light; (3) correct pairing between the dose readings and measurement locations. The authors acquired 100 dose measurements at various positions in the phantom, which was scanned using a clinical chest protocol with both angular and z-axis tube current modulations.
RESULTS: Dose calibration was performed according to the beam qualities inside the phantom as determined from an established Monte Carlo model of the scanner. The influence of the brief exposure to dimmed room light was evaluated and deemed negligible. Pairing between the OSL readings and measurement locations was ensured by the experimental design. The organ doses measured for a routine adult chest scan protocol ranged from 9.4 to 18.8 mGy, depending on the composition, location, and surrounding anatomy of the organs. The dose distribution across different slices of the phantom strongly depended on the z-axis mA modulation. In the same slice, doses to the soft tissues other than the spinal cord demonstrated relatively small variations, with the maximum COV around 11.4%. This might be attributed to the angular mA modulation, the placement of the dosimeters, the chest cavity of the scanned region, and the size of the phantom. Doses to the spinal cord were consistently lower than those to other soft tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: The method is suited for acquiring densely sampled organ dose maps, and can be used for studying dose distributions relevant to subject size, organ location, and clinical CT protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927332      PMCID: PMC3739834          DOI: 10.1118/1.4816299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  On the advantages and disadvantages of optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry and thermoluminescence dosimetry.

Authors:  S W S McKeever; M Moscovitch
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Analyses and applications of single scan dose profiles in computed tomography.

Authors:  H Y Tsai; C J Tung; M H Huang; Y L Wan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Angular dependence of the nanoDot OSL dosimeter.

Authors:  James R Kerns; Stephen F Kry; Narayan Sahoo; David S Followill; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range.

Authors:  Rani M Al-Senan; Mustapha R Hatab
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV.

Authors:  J M Boone; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Monte Carlo assessment of CT dose equilibration in PMMA and water cylinders with diameters from 6 to 55 cm.

Authors:  Xinhua Li; Da Zhang; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Estimating thyroid dose in pediatric CT exams from surface dose measurement.

Authors:  Rani Al-Senan; Deborah L Mueller; Mustapha R Hatab
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology.

Authors:  Chun Ruan; Eduardo G Yukihara; William J Clouse; Patricia B R Gasparian; Salahuddin Ahmad
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dose spread functions in computed tomography: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  An optically stimulated luminescence system to measure dose profiles in x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  E G Yukihara; C Ruan; P B R Gasparian; W J Clouse; C Kalavagunta; S Ahmad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  8 in total

1.  In vitro dose measurements in a human cadaver with abdomen/pelvis CT scans.

Authors:  Da Zhang; Atul Padole; Xinhua Li; Sarabjeet Singh; Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja; Diego Lira; Tianyu Liu; Jim Q Shi; Alexi Otrakji; Mannudeep K Kalra; X George Xu; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation exposure using the O-arm® surgical imaging system.

Authors:  Nicolas Pitteloud; Axel Gamulin; Christophe Barea; Jerome Damet; Guillaume Racloz; Marta Sans-Merce
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Patient-specific organ and effective dose estimates in pediatric oncology computed tomography.

Authors:  Yiming Gao; Brian Quinn; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Gerald Behr; Usman Mahmood; Daniel Long; X George Xu; Jean St Germain; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Recent Update on Radiation Dose Assessment for the State-of-the-Art Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Protocols.

Authors:  Sock Keow Tan; Chai Hong Yeong; Kwan Hoong Ng; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Optimal dose reduction algorithm using an attenuation-based tube current modulation method for cone-beam CT imaging.

Authors:  Kihong Son; Jieun Chang; Hoyeon Lee; Changhwan Kim; Taewon Lee; Seungryong Cho; Sohyun Park; Jin Sung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A comparison of pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation methods.

Authors:  Yiming Gao; Brian Quinn; Usman Mahmood; Daniel Long; Yusuf Erdi; Jean St Germain; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; X George Xu; Wesley E Bolch; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Investigation of Eye Lens Dose Estimate based on AAPM Report 293 in Head Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Winda Kusuma Dewi; Masdi Masdi; Freddy Haryanto; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.