Literature DB >> 23919642

Reporting about disability evaluation in European countries.

Jessica Anner1, Regina Kunz, Wout de Boer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the official requirements of the content of disability evaluation for social insurance across Europe and to explore how the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health is currently applied, using the rights and obligations of people with disabilities towards society as frame of reference.
METHODS: Survey. We used a semi-structured questionnaire to interview members of the European Union of Medicine in Assurance and Social Security (EUMASS), who are central medical advisors in social insurance systems in their country. We performed two email follow-up rounds to complete and verify responses.
RESULTS: Fifteen respondents from 15 countries participated. In all countries, medical examiners are required to report about a claimant's working capacity and prognosis. In 14 countries, medical reports ought to contain information about socio-medical history and feasible interventions to improve the claimant's health status. The format of medical reporting on working capacity varies widely (free text, semi- and fully structured reports). One country makes a reference to the ICF in their reports on working capacity, others consider doing so.
CONCLUSION: Official requirements on medical reporting about disability in social insurance across Europe follow the frame of four features: work capacity, socio-medical history, feasibility of intervention and prognosis of disability. There is an increasing trend to make formal or informal reference to the ICF in the reports about working capacity. The four features and the ICF may provide common references across countries to describe disability evaluation, facilitating national and international research. Implications for Rehabilitation Reporting about disability in social insurance in different countries is about work capacity, social medical history, feasibility of intervention and prognosis of disability. Formats of reporting on work capacity vary among countries, from free text to semi-structured report forms to fully structured and scaled report forms of working capacity. The ICF could serve as a reference for describing work capacity, provided the ICF contains all necessary categories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability evaluation; ICF; social insurance; work capacity evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23919642     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.821180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  16 in total

1.  The perceived importance of prognostic aspects considered by physicians during work disability evaluation: a survey.

Authors:  Sylvia P Snoeck-Krygsman; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Birgit H P M Donker-Cools; Carel T J Hulshof; Lyanne P Jansen; René J Kox; Jan L Hoving
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  A search strategy to identify studies on the prognosis of work disability: a diagnostic test framework.

Authors:  Rob Kok; Jos A H M Verbeek; Babs Faber; Frank J H van Dijk; Jan L Hoving
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Use of a structured functional evaluation process for independent medical evaluations of claimants presenting with disabling mental illness: rationale and design for a multi-center reliability study.

Authors:  Monica Bachmann; Wout de Boer; Stefan Schandelmaier; Andrea Leibold; Renato Marelli; Joerg Jeger; Ulrike Hoffmann-Richter; Ralph Mager; Heinz Schaad; Thomas Zumbrunn; Nicole Vogel; Oskar Bänziger; Jason W Busse; Katrin Fischer; Regina Kunz
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.

Authors:  Jürgen Barth; Wout E L de Boer; Jason W Busse; Jan L Hoving; Sarah Kedzia; Rachel Couban; Katrin Fischer; David Y von Allmen; Jerry Spanjer; Regina Kunz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-01-25

5.  Limitations to Work-Related Functioning of People with Persistent "Medically Unexplained" Physical Symptoms: A Modified Delphi Study Among Physicians.

Authors:  K H N Weerdesteijn; F G Schaafsma; A J van der Beek; J R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

6.  Functional Interviewing Was Associated With Improved Agreement Among Expert Psychiatrists in Estimating Claimant Work Capacity: A Secondary Data Analysis of Real-Life Work Disability Evaluations.

Authors:  David Y von Allmen; Sarah Kedzia; Raphael Dettwiler; Nicole Vogel; Regina Kunz; Wout E L de Boer
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Online Survey of Medical and Psychological Professionals on Structured Instruments for the Assessment of Work Ability in Psychiatric Patients.

Authors:  Roman Schleifer; Alex Gamma; Ingeborg Warnke; Mounira Jabat; Wulf Rössler; Michael Liebrenz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire.

Authors:  Regine Lohss; Timm Rosburg; Monica Bachmann; Brigitte Walter Meyer; Wout de Boer; Katrin Fischer; Regina Kunz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Content Validation of a Practice-Based Work Capacity Assessment Instrument Using ICF Core Sets.

Authors:  Johan H Sengers; Femke I Abma; Loes Wilming; Pepijn D D M Roelofs; Yvonne F Heerkens; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-06

10.  Sick-listed workers' expectations about and experiences with independent medical evaluation: a qualitative interview study from Norway.

Authors:  Aase Aamland; Silje Maeland
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.581

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.