Literature DB >> 23911191

Do currently available blood glucose monitors meet regulatory standards? 1-day public meeting in Arlington, Virginia.

David C Klonoff1, Juliet S Reyes.   

Abstract

Blood glucose monitors (BGMs) are approved by regulatory agencies based on their performance during strict testing conducted by their manufacturers. However, after approval, there is uncertainty whether BGMs maintain the accuracy levels that were achieved in the initial data. The availability of inaccurate BGM systems pose a public health problem because their readings serve as a basis for treatment decisions that can be incorrect. Several articles have concluded that BGMs in the marketplace may not consistently provide accurate results in accordance with the regulatory standards that led to approval. To address this growing concern, Diabetes Technology Society organized and conducted a 1-day public meeting on May 21, 2013, in Arlington, VA, presided by its president, David Klonoff, M.D., FACP, Fellow AIMBE, to determine whether BGMs on the market meet regulatory standards. The meeting consisted of four sessions in which Food and Drug Administration diabetes experts as well as leading academic clinicians and clinical chemists participated: (1) How is BGM performance determined? (2) Do approved BGMs perform according to International Organization for Standardization standards? (3) How do approved BGMs perform when used by patients and health care professionals? (4) What could be the consequence of poor BGM performance?
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911191      PMCID: PMC3879774          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

1.  Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

2.  Between-lot variation in external quality assessment of glucose: clinical importance and effect on participant performance evaluation.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Nina Gade Christensen; Geir Thue; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.

Authors:  Ronald L Brazg; Leslie J Klaff; Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

4.  Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.

Authors:  Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Christina Schmid; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

5.  Blood glucose meters employing dynamic electrochemistry are stable against hematocrit interference in a laboratory setting.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Petra B Musholt; Christina Schipper; Filiz Demircik; Carina Hengesbach; Frank Flacke; Jochen Sieber; Thomas Forst
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

6.  Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Michael Mitri; Petra B Musholt; Daniela Sachsenheimer; Marcus Borchert; Andrew Yap; Thomas Forst
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Eva Zschornack; Serge Kocher; Jacques Tshiananga; Frank Heister; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 8.  When the earth trembles in the Americas: the experience of Haiti and Chile 2010.

Authors:  R Vanholder; D Borniche; S Claus; R Correa-Rotter; R Crestani; M C Ferir; N Gibney; A Hurtado; V A Luyckx; D Portilla; S Rodriguez; M S Sever; J Vanmassenhove; R Wainstein
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2010-08-30

9.  Effects of dynamic temperature and humidity stresses on point-of-care glucose testing for disaster care.

Authors:  Richard F Louie; William J Ferguson; Stephanie L Sumner; Jimmy N Yu; Corbin M Curtis; Gerald J Kost
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.385

Review 10.  Mass medical evacuation: Hurricane Katrina and nursing experiences at the New Orleans airport.

Authors:  Kelly R Klein; Nanci E Nagel
Journal:  Disaster Manag Response       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun
View more
  14 in total

1.  Freedom of speech and science: can companies force us to withdraw data they don't like?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

2.  Performance and System Validation of a New Cellular-Enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using a New Standard Reference Measurement Procedure of Isotope Dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kimon Angelides; Risë K Matsunami; David A Engler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-22

Review 3.  How Much Accuracy of Interstitial Glucose Measurement Is Enough? Is There a Need for New Evidence?

Authors:  Norbert Hermanns; Dominic Ehrmann; Bernhard Kulzer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-10

4.  The surveillance error grid.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Courtney Lias; Robert Vigersky; William Clarke; Joan Lee Parkes; David B Sacks; M Sue Kirkman; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

Review 5.  Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Priya Prahalad
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-08

6.  FDA-approved biosimilar insulin: good enough for critical care, adulterated, or counterfeit? How can we tell?

Authors:  Alan W Carter
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-16

7.  Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.

Authors:  Steven Setford; Stuart Phillips; Mike Grady
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-07

8.  If SMBG Accuracy Is Critical to Patient Safety, Why Are Inaccurate Meters Still on the Market?

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 9.  Point-of-care blood glucose testing for diabetes care in hospitalized patients: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Rajesh Rajendran; Gerry Rayman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-05

10.  Patient Satisfaction With a New, High Accuracy Blood Glucose Meter That Provides Personalized Guidance, Insight, and Encouragement.

Authors:  Laurence B Katz; Lorna Stewart; Brian Guthrie; Hilary Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.