Literature DB >> 26002836

Performance and System Validation of a New Cellular-Enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using a New Standard Reference Measurement Procedure of Isotope Dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry.

Kimon Angelides1, Risë K Matsunami2, David A Engler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the accuracy, precision, and linearity of the In Touch blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS), a new color touch screen and cellular-enabled blood glucose meter, using a new rapid, highly precise and accurate (13)C6 isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method (IDLC-MS).
METHODS: Blood glucose measurements from the In Touch BGMS were referenced to a validated UPLC-MRM standard reference measurement procedure previously shown to be highly accurate and precise. Readings from the In Touch BGMS were taken over the blood glucose range of 24-640 mg/dL using 12 concentrations of blood glucose. Ten In Touch BGMS and 3 lots of test strips were used with 10 replicates at each concentration. A lay user study was also performed to assess the ease of use.
RESULTS: At blood glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL 100% of the measurements are within ±8 mg/dL from the true reference standard; at blood glucose levels >75 mg/dL 100% of the measurements are within ±15% of the true reference standard. 100% of the results are within category A of the consensus grid. Within-run precision show CV < 3.72% between 24-50 mg/dL and CV<2.22% between 500 and 600 mg/dL. The results show that the In Touch meter exceeds the minimum criteria of both the ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 standards. The results from a user panel show that 100% of the respondents reported that the color touch screen, with its graphic user interface (GUI), is well labeled and easy to navigate.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first touch screen glucose meter and the first study where accuracy of a new BGMS has been measured against a true primary reference standard, namely IDLC-MS.
© 2015 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In Touch® BGMS; accuracy; blood glucose; isotope dilution mass spectrometry; self-monitoring; standardization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26002836      PMCID: PMC4667331          DOI: 10.1177/1932296815586016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  13 in total

1.  The surveillance error grid.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Courtney Lias; Robert Vigersky; William Clarke; Joan Lee Parkes; David B Sacks; M Sue Kirkman; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations.

Authors:  Andrew I Geller; Nadine Shehab; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Scott R Kegler; Kelly N Weidenbach; Gina J Ryan; Daniel S Budnitz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results.

Authors:  Ksenia Tonyushkina; James H Nichols
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 5.  Diabetes technology and the human factor.

Authors:  A Liberman; B Buckingham; M Phillip
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract Suppl       Date:  2011-02

6.  Development and Validation of a Rapid (13)C6-Glucose Isotope Dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry Method for Use in Determining System Accuracy and Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices.

Authors:  Risë K Matsunami; Kimon Angelides; David A Engler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-18

7.  Glucose measurement: time for a gold standard.

Authors:  Joakim Hagvik
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

8.  Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640.

Authors:  P J Twomey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Do currently available blood glucose monitors meet regulatory standards? 1-day public meeting in Arlington, Virginia.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Juliet S Reyes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

10.  Clinical implications and economic impact of accuracy differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Erwin S Budiman; Navendu Samant; Ansgar Resch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Rapid (13)C6-Glucose Isotope Dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry Method for Use in Determining System Accuracy and Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices.

Authors:  Risë K Matsunami; Kimon Angelides; David A Engler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.