Literature DB >> 23904385

Management of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty--a 236 hip, 6-14-year follow-up study.

Guo-Qiang Zhang1, Yan Wang2, Ji-Ying Chen1, Yong-Gang Zhou1, Xiu-Tang Cao1, Wei Chai1, Ming Ni1, Xiang Li1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical effect of impaction bone graft and distal press-fit fixation for the reconstruction of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty. A total of 234 patients (involving 236 hips) with Paprosky III and IV femoral bone defects were treated with the revision total hip arthroplasty from June 1998 to Aug. 2006. Impaction bone graft technique was used for 112 hips, with allogeneic freeze-dried bone as bone graft and SPII as prosthesis. With 124 hips, modular distal press-fit fixation and tapered femoral stem (MP stem) were employed. After the operation, the subjects were followed up on regular basis and results were assessed by using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Radiolucence, subsidence and loosening were observed and complications, including infection, fracture, dislocation etc. were recorded. A 6-14-year follow-up showed that prostheses failed, due to infection, in 4 patients of impaction bone graft group and that 6 patients in the press-fit fixation group experienced prosthesis failure, with the survival rates for the two techniques being 96.43% and 95.16%, respectively. One-way ANOVA showed that prosthesis survival was significantly associated with surgery-related complications (P<0.05) and was not related to the type of the bone defects (P>0.05). The rate of complications bore significant association with the type of bone defects in the two groups (P<0.05). Our study showed that the two revision methods could achieve satisfactory mid-term and long-term results for the reconstruction of severe bone defects. It is of great significance for attaining high prosthesis survival rate to select suitable operation on the basis of the type of bone defect. Careful operative manipulation and post-operative rehabilitation aimed at reducing complications are also important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23904385     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-013-1166-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  24 in total

1.  [Management of the bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yong-gang Zhou
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2005-10-15

2.  Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Mats O Beckman; Anders Enocson; Anders Schmalholz; André Stark
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  [Current trends in revision of total hip arthroplasty and its present status in China].

Authors:  Yan Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2012-05

Review 4.  Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Daniel A Oakes; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Incorporation of morselized bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Sanne van der Donk; Pieter Buma; Tom J J H Slooff; Jean W M Gardeniers; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth.

Authors:  Sanne van der Donk; Tim Weernink; Pieter Buma; Per Aspenberg; Tom J J H Slooff; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation: good short-term results in 125 revisions.

Authors:  Ole Ovesen; Claus Emmeluth; Christian Hofbauer; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Louis M Kwong; A John Miller; Phillipp Lubinus
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Park; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem.

Authors:  Jose A Rodriguez; Robert Fada; Steven B Murphy; Vijay J Rasquinha; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.