Literature DB >> 17920471

Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy.

Youn-Soo Park1, Young-Wan Moon, Seung-Jae Lim.   

Abstract

We reviewed 62 revision total hip arthroplasties performed using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem after a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. An extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) was used in 32 of the 62 hips (52%), whereas no osteotomy was used in the remaining 30 hips. The mean postoperative Harris hip score among the patients was 87.3 points. The mean stem subsidence was 1.1 mm. With the exception of one reoperation for a deep infection, no femoral revision was performed because of mechanical failure. Complications included intraoperative diaphyseal split fractures (6%), cortical perforations (6%), and dislocations (5%). Postoperative Harris hip scores, femoral component stability, and overall complication rates did not differ between the group treated with an ETO and that treated without it. However, the rates of cortical perforation and marked stem subsidence (>5 mm) were significantly higher in the group treated without an ETO than those in the group treated with an ETO, but these were not significantly different when stratified by femoral bone defect. The potential advantages of this implant design could be highlighted in a clinical setting when inserted using an ETO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920471     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  27 in total

1.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A trochanteric sparing technique for stem removal in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Aftab; D Basu; D Jagajeevanram
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Gopinath Duraisamy; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-29

5.  A new technique of endoprosthetic replacement for osteosarcoma of proximal femur with intra-articular extension.

Authors:  E Oragui; M Nannaparaju; K Sri-Ram; W Khan; A Hashemi-Nejad; J Skinner
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-10-13

6.  Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Magdalena Mashadi; Javad Parvizi; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Management of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty--a 236 hip, 6-14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Guo-Qiang Zhang; Yan Wang; Ji-Ying Chen; Yong-Gang Zhou; Xiu-Tang Cao; Wei Chai; Ming Ni; Xiang Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

8.  Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.