Literature DB >> 19232890

Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation: good short-term results in 125 revisions.

Ole Ovesen1, Claus Emmeluth, Christian Hofbauer, Søren Overgaard.   

Abstract

After 2 to 7 years we reviewed 125 prosthetic hip arthroplasty stem revisions using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation. Median age of these patients was 68 (33-92) years. Baseline and follow-up data were registered prospectively according to the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Survival, free of any rerevision, was 94%. Harris Hip Score improved from average 44 to 85. Bony regeneration was an early and significant finding in most cases. Complications included 4 (3%) fractures intraoperatively and 8 (6%) dislocations, 4 (3%) deep infections, and 1 (1%) stem fracture. This modular taper system is very versatile, can be used in most femoral revision cases, and allows rapid bone remodeling. We did not find an increased number of complications compared to the literature. Further long-term follow-up, however, is essential. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232890     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.

Authors:  Curtis W Hartman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Magdalena Mashadi; Javad Parvizi; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Management of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty--a 236 hip, 6-14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Guo-Qiang Zhang; Yan Wang; Ji-Ying Chen; Yong-Gang Zhou; Xiu-Tang Cao; Wei Chai; Ming Ni; Xiang Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

4.  Mid- to long-term results of the Cone-Conical modular system in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abd-Allah El Ashmawy; Hazem A H Hosny; Ahmed El-Bakoury; Rathan Yarlagadda; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years followup.

Authors:  Andrew P Van Houwelingen; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Nelson V Greidanus; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Influence of prosthesis design and implantation technique on implant stresses after cementless revision THR.

Authors:  Markus O Heller; Manav Mehta; William R Taylor; Dong-Yeong Kim; Andrew Speirs; Georg N Duda; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; André Stark; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.