Literature DB >> 18977637

Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem.

Jose A Rodriguez1, Robert Fada, Steven B Murphy, Vijay J Rasquinha, Chitranjan S Ranawat.   

Abstract

Femoral deficiency has been shown to adversely affect the results of revision total hip arthroplasty. Tapered titanium modular stems allow distal fixation of the fluted, conical portion of the implant in the setting of proximal bone loss. One hundred two consecutive hips with proximal bone loss underwent revision femoral reconstruction between 1998 and 2002 at 3 centers using the Link MP modular stem. Forty-three hips had Mallory type 3C femoral deficiency. Ninety-seven hips were observed for an average of 45 months (range, 24-72; median, 36 months). Clinically, mean Harris hip score improved from 36 to 84 (range, 54-99). Radiographically, 93 hips were considered stable, with no circumferential lucencies at the distal fixation surface. Three hips migrated and required revision, along with one periprosthetic fracture. Five other hips had nonprogressive migration of 1 to 2 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18977637     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

Review 1.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights®: modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.

Authors:  Curtis W Hartman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Femoral revision for periprosthetic fracture in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luke G Menken; Jose A Rodriguez
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-14

4.  Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Rocco D'Apolito; Allina A Nocon; Thomas P Sculco; Peter K Sculco; Mathias P Bostrom
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Distal non-traumatic fracture of the cementless MP stem: A case report and review of previous reported cases.

Authors:  Hussein Abdelaziz; Christian Ansorge; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-30

6.  Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Magdalena Mashadi; Javad Parvizi; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Management of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty--a 236 hip, 6-14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Guo-Qiang Zhang; Yan Wang; Ji-Ying Chen; Yong-Gang Zhou; Xiu-Tang Cao; Wei Chai; Ming Ni; Xiang Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

8.  Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.