Literature DB >> 23903998

Outcomes of surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy accompanying local kyphosis (comparison between laminoplasty alone and posterior reconstruction surgery using the screw-rod system).

Hiroshi Miyamoto1, Koichiro Maeno, Koki Uno, Kenichiro Kakutani, Kotaro Nishida, Masatoshi Sumi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The surgical strategy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) accompanying local kyphosis is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to compare and evaluate the outcomes of two types of surgery for CSM accompanying local kyphosis: (1) laminoplasty alone (LP) and (2) posterior reconstruction surgery (PR) in which we corrected the local kyphosis using a pedicle screw or lateral mass screw.
METHODS: Sixty patients who presented with local kyphosis exceeding 5° were enrolled. LP and PR were each performed on a group of 30 of these patients; 30 CSM patients without local kyphosis, who had undergone LP, were used as controls. The follow-up period was 2 years or longer. Preoperative local kyphosis angles in LP and PR were 8.3° ± 4.4° and 8.8° ± 5.7°, respectively. Preoperative C2-7 angles in LP, PR and controls were -1.7° ± 9.6°, -0.4° ± 7.2° and -12.0° ± 5.6°, respectively. The recovery rate of the JOA score, local kyphosis angle and C2-7 angle at post-op and follow-up were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: The recovery rate of the JOA score in the LP group (32.6 %) was significantly worse than that in the PR group (44.5 %) and that of controls (53.8 %). Local kyphosis angles in the PR and LP groups at follow-up were 4.0° ± 8.6° and 8.0° ± 6.0°, respectively. However, although the C2-7 angle at follow-up was improved to -11.1° ± 12.7° in PR, and maintained at -11.6° ± 6.2° in controls, it deteriorated to 0.5° ± 12.7° in LP.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to compare the outcomes between LP alone and PR for CSM accompanying local kyphosis. It revealed that PR resulted in a better clinical outcome than did LP alone. This result may be due to reduction of local kyphosis, stabilization of the unstable segment, and/or the maintenance of C2-7 angle until follow-up in the PR group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23903998      PMCID: PMC3906439          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2923-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line.

Authors:  Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Masashi Yamazaki; Junko Kawabe; Tomonori Endo; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Akihiko Okawa; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Hiroaki Konishi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a computed tomography cutout technique.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyamoto; Koki Uno
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-12

3.  Clinicoradiologic study of cervical laminoplasty with posterolateral fusion or bone graft.

Authors:  Y Morio; K Yamamoto; R Teshima; H Nagashima; H Hagino
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Correction of cervical kyphosis using pedicle screw fixation systems.

Authors:  K Abumi; Y Shono; H Taneichi; M Ito; K Kaneda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  T-Saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  C C Edwards; J G Heller; D H Silcox
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions of the cervical spine.

Authors:  K Abumi; K Kaneda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Spinal kyphosis causes demyelination and neuronal loss in the spinal cord: a new model of kyphotic deformity using juvenile Japanese small game fowls.

Authors:  Kentaro Shimizu; Masaya Nakamura; Yuji Nishikawa; Sadahisa Hijikata; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression.

Authors:  Kenzo Uchida; Hideaki Nakajima; Ryuichiro Sato; Takafumi Yayama; Erisa S Mwaka; Shigeru Kobayashi; Hisatoshi Baba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-11

Review 9.  Complications of posterior cervical plating.

Authors:  J G Heller; D H Silcox; C E Sutterlin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Ken Ninomiya; Michiya Kihara; Yukio Horiuchi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-01
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Kuniyoshi Abumi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Impact of the surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy on the preoperative cervical sagittal balance: a review of prospective comparative cohort between anterior decompression with fusion and laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kenichiro Sakai; Toshitaka Yoshii; Takashi Hirai; Yoshiyasu Arai; Kenichi Shinomiya; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effect of correction surgery for cervical kyphosis on compensatory mechanisms in overall spinopelvic sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyamoto; Kazuki Hashimoto; Terumasa Ikeda; Masao Akagi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Open-Door Laminoplasty, French-Door Laminoplasty, Laminectomy and Fusion, and Laminectomy Alone for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Bayesian Network Analysis.

Authors:  Xian Li; Hui Yu; Kristian Welle; Martin Gathen; Li Zhang; Jin Xiao; Koroush Kabir
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  So Kato; Michael Fehlings
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

6.  Symptomatic cord compression by paraspinal musculature following cervical laminectomy: rare complication.

Authors:  Po-Hsun Tu; Chun-Ting Chen; Ching-Chang Chen; Jyi-Feng Chen; Chieh-Tsai Wu; Kuo-Chen Wei; Zhuo-Hao Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Wen; Jing-Yu Du; Zhi-Heng Ling; Hai-Dong Xu; Xiang-Jin Lin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Laminoplasty instead of laminectomy as a decompression method in posterior instrumented fusion for degenerative cervical kyphosis with stenosis.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ru-Ping Lee; Ing-Ho Chen; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Kuan-Lin Liu; Cheng-Huan Peng; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of modified open-door laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fusion in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Nan Su; Qi Fei; Bingqiang Wang; Dong Li; Jinjun Li; Hai Meng; Yong Yang; Ai Guo
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 10.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Hui Wang; Sen Liu; Huang-Da An; Huan Liu; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.