Literature DB >> 20043766

Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.

Mitsuru Yagi1, Ken Ninomiya, Michiya Kihara, Yukio Horiuchi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to determine the long-term clinical significance of and the risk factors for intramedullary signal intensity change on MR images in patients with cervical compression myelopathy (CCM), an entity most commonly seen with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).
METHODS: One hundred seventy-four patients with CCM but without cervical disc herniation, severe OPLL (in which the cervical canal is < 10 mm due to OPLL), or severe kyphotic deformity (> 15 degrees of cervical kyphosis) who underwent surgery were initially selected. One hundred eight of these patients were followed for > 36 months, and the 71 patients who agreed to MR imaging examinations both pre- and postsurgery were enrolled in the study (the mean follow-up duration was 60.6 months). All patients underwent cervical laminoplasty. The authors used the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and recovery ratio for evaluation of pre- and postoperative outcomes. The multifactorial effects of variables such as age, sex, a history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, duration of symptoms, postoperative expansion of the high signal intensity area of the spinal cord on MR imaging, sagittal arrangement of the cervical spine, presence of ventral spinal cord compression, and presence of an unstable cervical spine were studied.
RESULTS: Change in intramedullary signal intensity was observed in 50 of the 71 patients preoperatively. The pre- and postoperative JOA scores and the recovery ratio were significantly lower in the patients with signal intensity change. The mean JOA score of the upper extremities was also significantly lower in these patients. Twenty-one patients showed hypointensity in their T1-weighted images, and a nonsignificant correlation was observed between intensity in the T1-weighted image and the mean JOA score and recovery ratio. The risk factors for signal intensity change were instability of the cervical spine (OR 8.255, p = 0.037) and ventral spinal cord compression (OR 5.502, p < 0.01). Among these patients, 16 had postoperative expansion of the high signal intensity area of the spinal cord. The mean JOA score and the recovery ratio at the final follow-up were significantly lower in these patients. The risk factor for postoperative expansion of the high signal intensity area was instability of the cervical spine (OR 5.509, p = 0.022). No significant correlation was observed between signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images and postoperative expansion of the intramedullary high signal intensity area on T2-weighted MR images.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term clinical outcome was significantly worse in patients with intramedullary signal intensity changes on MR images. The risk factors were instability of the cervical spine and severe ventral spinal compression. The long-term clinical outcome was also significantly worse in patients with postoperative expansion of the high signal intensity area. The fact that cervical instability was a risk factor for the postoperative expansion of the high signal intensity indicates that this high signal intensity area occurred, not only from necrosis secondary to ischemia of the anterior spinal artery, but also from the repeated minor traumas inflicted on the spinal cord from an unstable cervical spine. The long-term neurological outcome found in the preliminary study of patients with CCM who had cervical instability and intramedullary signal intensity changes on MR images suggests that surgical treatment should include posterior fixation along with cervical laminoplasty or anterior spinal fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20043766     DOI: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  32 in total

1.  Prevention of spinal cord injury using brain-evoked muscle-action potential (Br(E)-MsEP) monitoring in cervical spinal screw fixation.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Tetsuro Hida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Postoperative MR Imaging of Spontaneous Transdural Spinal Cord Herniation: Expected Findings and Complications.

Authors:  S Gaudino; R Colantonio; C Schiarelli; M Martucci; R Calandrelli; A Botto; M Pileggi; E Gangemi; G Maira; C Colosimo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  The role of DTI in early detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary study with 3-T MRI.

Authors:  Batuhan Kara; Azim Celik; Selhan Karadereler; Levent Ulusoy; Kursat Ganiyusufoglu; Levent Onat; Ayhan Mutlu; Ibrahim Ornek; Mustafa Sirvanci; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Outcomes of surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy accompanying local kyphosis (comparison between laminoplasty alone and posterior reconstruction surgery using the screw-rod system).

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyamoto; Koichiro Maeno; Koki Uno; Kenichiro Kakutani; Kotaro Nishida; Masatoshi Sumi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the prediction of outcome following surgical intervention in 93 patients using T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans.

Authors:  Hatem M I Salem; Khalid M I Salem; Filip Burget; Raj Bommireddy; Zdenek Klezl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in 26 dogs with canine osseous-associated cervical spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  Vishal D Murthy; Luis Gaitero; Gabrielle Monteith
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  CT angiography of anterior spinal artery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhengfeng Zhang; Honggang Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Risk factors for a poor outcome following surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ryoji Tauchi; Shiro Imagama; Hidefumi Inoh; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Yuji Matsubara; Atsushi Harada; Yudo Hachiya; Mistuhiro Kamiya; Hisatake Yoshihara; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Does the type of T2-weighted hyperintensity influence surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A review.

Authors:  Aditya Vedantam; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy - update and future directions.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Christopher S Ahuja; Muhammad A Akbar; Christopher D Witiw; Farshad Nassiri; Julio C Furlan; Armin Curt; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.