Literature DB >> 28451859

Effect of correction surgery for cervical kyphosis on compensatory mechanisms in overall spinopelvic sagittal alignment.

Hiroshi Miyamoto1, Kazuki Hashimoto2, Terumasa Ikeda2, Masao Akagi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Progression of kyphotic deformity at the middle/lower cervical spine can cause difficulty with horizontal gaze, so compensation at other spinopelvic parts may occur. However, the precise mechanism remains unclear. The present study investigated the effect of correction surgery for cervical kyphosis on the compensatory mechanisms in overall spinopelvic sagittal alignment.
METHODS: Forty-one patients, comprising 23 males and 18 females (mean age 67 years), underwent correction surgery for cervical kyphosis using the posterior screw-rod system. Spinopelvic lateral radiographs in the standing position were taken before and after surgery. C0-1 angle, C1-2 angle, clivo-axial angle (CAA), C2-7 angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope were measured. Correlations between C2-7 angle and these parameters before surgery, and correlations between the correction angle of cervical kyphosis and postoperative changes of these parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: Negative correlations were found between the C2-7 angle and CAA (R = -0.640, p < 0.01), and C2-7 angle and C0-1 angle (R = -0.762, p < 0.001) before surgery. Negative correlations were found between the correction angle of C2-7 and change of CAA (R = -0.718, p < 0.001), and between the correction angle of C2-7 and change of C0-1 angle (R = -0.672, p < 0.01) after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that C0-1 angle and CAA are more important in the compensatory mechanism for kyphotic deformity at the middle/lower cervical spine compared to downward parameters. That is, to maintain horizontal gaze, lordosis increases at the cranio-cervical junction with greater kyphosis at the middle/lower cervical spine. Correction of cervical kyphosis in the middle/lower cervical spine resulted in normalization of the C0-1 angle and CAA because the compensatory mechanism at the cranio-cervical junction for obtaining horizontal gaze was no longer necessary after surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical; Compensatory; Correction; Kyphosis; Spino-pelvic

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28451859     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5106-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The dropped head syndrome.

Authors:  G A Suarez; J J Kelly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spine stabilization methods using a porcine model.

Authors:  J D Richman; T E Daniel; D D Anderson; P L Miller; R A Douglas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Outcomes of surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy accompanying local kyphosis (comparison between laminoplasty alone and posterior reconstruction surgery using the screw-rod system).

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyamoto; Koichiro Maeno; Koki Uno; Kenichiro Kakutani; Kotaro Nishida; Masatoshi Sumi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical myelopathy caused by C3-C4 spondylosis in elderly patients: a radiographic analysis of pathogenesis.

Authors:  H Mihara; K Ohnari; M Hachiya; S Kondo; K Yamada
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36" radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  William C Horton; Courtney W Brown; Keith H Bridwell; Steven D Glassman; Se-Il Suk; Charles W Cha
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Authors:  Jessica A Tang; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  A retrospective radiographic analysis of subaxial sagittal alignment after posterior C1-C2 fusion.

Authors:  Hisashi Yoshimoto; Manabu Ito; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Yoshihisa Kotani; Yasuhiro Shono; Takashige Takada; Akio Minami
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Sagittal alignment of the spine: What do you need to know?

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Jeffrey J Varghese; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  Postoperative Increase in Occiput-C2 Angle Negatively Impacts Subaxial Lordosis after Occipito-Upper Cervical Posterior Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Taigo Inada; Takeo Furuya; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Satoshi Maki; Takane Suzuki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Masaaki Aramomi; Chikato Mannoji; Masao Koda
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  Radiologic features of dropped head syndrome in the overall sagittal alignment of the spine.

Authors:  Kazuki Hashimoto; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Terumasa Ikeda; Masao Akagi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.