Literature DB >> 23899515

A statistical analysis of the Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping technique.

Daniel J Park1, Neal K Bangerter, Ahsan Javed, Joshua Kaggie, Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi, Glen R Morrell.   

Abstract

A number of B1 mapping methods have been introduced. A model to facilitate choice among these methods is valuable, as the performance of each technique is affected by a variety of factors, including acquisition signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The Bloch-Siegert shift B1 mapping method has recently garnered significant interest. In this paper, we present a statistical model suitable for analysis of the Bloch-Siegert shift method. Unlike previously presented models, the analysis is valid in both low SNR and high SNR regimes. We present a detailed analysis of the performance of the Bloch-Siegert shift B1 mapping method across a broad range of acquisition scenarios, and compare it to two other B1 mapping techniques (the dual angle method and the phase sensitive method). Further validation of the model is presented through both Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results. The simulations and experimental results match the model well, lending confidence to its accuracy. Each technique is found to perform well with high acquisition SNR. However, our results suggest that the dual angle method is not reliable in low SNR environments. Furthermore, the phase sensitive method appears to outperform the Bloch-Siegert shift method in these low-SNR cases, although variations of the Bloch-Siegert method may be possible that improve its performance at low SNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23899515      PMCID: PMC3845965          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/16/5673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  RF pulse optimization for Bloch-Siegert B ₁⁺ mapping.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Brian K Rutt; Adam B Kerr
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Transmit SENSE.

Authors:  Ulrich Katscher; Peter Börnert; Christoph Leussler; Johan S van den Brink
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  B1 mapping by Bloch-Siegert shift.

Authors:  Laura I Sacolick; Florian Wiesinger; Ileana Hancu; Mika W Vogel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  An analysis of the accuracy of magnetic resonance flip angle measurement methods.

Authors:  Glen R Morrell; Matthias C Schabel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Designing multichannel, multidimensional, arbitrary flip angle RF pulses using an optimal control approach.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Kevin F King; Yudong Zhu; Graeme C McKinnon; Zhi-Pei Liang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Uncertainty in T(1) mapping using the variable flip angle method with two flip angles.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Glen R Morrell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A phase-sensitive method of flip angle mapping.

Authors:  Glen R Morrell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A theoretical and experimental comparison of different techniques for B₁ mapping at very high fields.

Authors:  Rolf Pohmann; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Phase-sensitive sodium B1 mapping.

Authors:  Steven P Allen; Glen R Morrell; Brock Peterson; Danny Park; Garry E Gold; Joshua D Kaggie; Neal K Bangerter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  8 in total

1.  Propagation of error from parameter constraints in quantitative MRI: Example application of multiple spin echo T2 mapping.

Authors:  Christopher L Lankford; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Local Multi-Channel RF Surface Coil versus Body RF Coil Transmission for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at 3 Tesla: Which Configuration Is Winning the Game?

Authors:  Oliver Weinberger; Lukas Winter; Matthias A Dieringer; Antje Els; Celal Oezerdem; Jan Rieger; Andre Kuehne; Antonino M Cassara; Harald Pfeiffer; Friedrich Wetterling; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bloch-Siegert B1-Mapping Improves Accuracy and Precision of Longitudinal Relaxation Measurements in the Breast at 3 T.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Richard D Dortch; William Grissom; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12

4.  Accuracy and precision of electrical permittivity mapping at 3T: the impact of three B 1 + mapping techniques.

Authors:  Soraya Gavazzi; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Alessandro Sbrizzi; H Petra Kok; Lukas J A Stalpers; Jan J W Lagendijk; Hans Crezee; Astrid L H M W van Lier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Robust 3D Bloch-Siegert based B 1 + mapping using multi-echo general linear modeling.

Authors:  Nadège Corbin; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Shaihan J Malik; Martina F Callaghan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Myelin water fraction mapping from multiple echo spin echoes and an independent B1 + map.

Authors:  Nima Mehdizadeh; Alan H Wilman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.737

7.  Bloch-Siegert B1+-mapping for human cardiac (31) P-MRS at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  William T Clarke; Matthew D Robson; Christopher T Rodgers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Large dynamic range relative B1+ mapping.

Authors:  Francesco Padormo; Aaron T Hess; Paul Aljabar; Shaihan J Malik; Peter Jezzard; Matthew D Robson; Joseph V Hajnal; Peter J Koopmans
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.668

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.