Literature DB >> 23897236

Novel method to evaluate angular stiffness of prosthetic feet from linear compression tests.

Peter G Adamczyk, Michelle Roland, Michael E Hahn.   

Abstract

Lower limb amputee gait during stance phase is related to the angular stiffness of the prosthetic foot, which describes the dependence of ankle torque on angular progression of the shank. However, there is little data on angular stiffness of prosthetic feet, and no method to directly measure it has been described. The objective of this study was to derive and evaluate a method to estimate the angular stiffness of prosthetic feet using a simple linear compression test. Linear vertical compression tests were performed on nine configurations of an experimental multicomponent foot (with known component stiffness properties and geometry), which allowed for parametric adjustment of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness properties and geometries. Each configuration was loaded under displacement control at distinct pylon test angles. Angular stiffness was calculated as a function of the pylon angle, normal force, and center of pressure (COP) rate of change with respect to linear displacement. Population root mean square error (RMSE) between the measured and predicted angular stiffness values for each configuration of the multicomponent foot was calculated to be 4.1 N-m/deg, dominated by a bias of the estimated values above the predicted values of 3.8 ± 1.6 N-m/deg. The best-fit line to estimated values was approximately parallel to the prediction, with R2 = 0.95. This method should be accessible for a variety of laboratories to estimate angular stiffness of experimental and commercially available prosthetic feet with minimal equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23897236      PMCID: PMC4023839          DOI: 10.1115/1.4025104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  9 in total

1.  The effects of prosthetic ankle dorsiflexion and energy return on below-knee amputee leg loading.

Authors:  Jessica D Ventura; Glenn K Klute; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on gait of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Elizabeth Klodd; Andrew Hansen; Stefania Fatone; Mark Edwards
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2010

3.  Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet.

Authors:  H W van Jaarsveld; H J Grootenboer; J de Vries; H F Koopman
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Heel-region properties of prosthetic feet and shoes.

Authors:  Glenn K Klute; Jocelyn S Berge; Ava D Segal
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2004-07

5.  Gait simulation via a 6-DOF parallel robot with iterative learning control.

Authors:  Patrick M Aubin; Matthew S Cowley; William R Ledoux
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet.

Authors:  Carolin Curtze; At L Hof; Helco G van Keeken; Jan P K Halbertsma; Klaas Postema; Bert Otten
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Parameter estimation for a prosthetic ankle.

Authors:  E Singer; G Ishai; E Kimmel
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot.

Authors:  J Perry; L A Boyd; S S Rao; S J Mulroy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1997-12

9.  Estimation of quasi-stiffness and propulsive work of the human ankle in the stance phase of walking.

Authors:  Kamran Shamaei; Gregory S Sawicki; Aaron M Dollar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Informing Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Prescription through Haptic Emulation of Candidate Devices.

Authors:  Joshua M Caputo; Peter G Adamczyk; Steven H Collins
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom       Date:  2015-05

3.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Considering passive mechanical properties and patient user motor performance in lower limb prosthesis design optimization to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2017-07-17

5.  Robotic Emulation of Candidate Prosthetic Foot Designs May Enable Efficient, Evidence-Based, and Individualized Prescriptions.

Authors:  Joshua M Caputo; Evan Dvorak; Kate Shipley; Mary Ann Miknevich; Peter G Adamczyk; Steven H Collins
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2021-12-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.