Literature DB >> 15558382

Heel-region properties of prosthetic feet and shoes.

Glenn K Klute1, Jocelyn S Berge, Ava D Segal.   

Abstract

The properties of the prosthetic components prescribed to amputees have the potential to ameliorate or exacerbate their comfort, mobility, and health. To measure the difference in heel-region structural properties of currently available prosthetic feet and shoes, we simulated the period of initial heel-ground contact with a pendulum apparatus. The energy dissipation capacity of the various prosthetic feet ranged from 33.6% to 52.6% of the input energy. Donning a shoe had a large effect. Energy dissipation of a Seattle Lightfoot 2 prosthetic foot was 45.3%, while addition of a walking, running, and orthopedic shoe increased energy dissipation to 63.0%, 73.0%, and 82.4%, respectively. The force versus deformation response to impact was modeled as a hardening spring in parallel with a position-dependent damping element. A nonlinear least-squares curve fit produced model coefficients useful for predicting the heel-region impact response of both prosthetic feet and shoes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15558382     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.02.0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  7 in total

1.  Novel method to evaluate angular stiffness of prosthetic feet from linear compression tests.

Authors:  Peter G Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes.

Authors:  Anne T Turner; Elizabeth G Halsne; Joshua M Caputo; Carl S Curran; Andrew H Hansen; Brian J Hafner; David C Morgenroth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Foot and shoe responsible for majority of soft tissue work in early stance of walking.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Considering passive mechanical properties and patient user motor performance in lower limb prosthesis design optimization to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2017-07-17

6.  A functional approach towards the design, development, and test of an affordable dynamic prosthetic foot.

Authors:  Mathieu Falbriard; Grégory Huot; Mathieu Janier; Rajasundar Chandran; Michael Rechsteiner; Véronique Michaud; Joël Cugnoni; John Botsis; Klaus Schönenberger; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Focusing research efforts on the unique needs of women prosthesis users.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Andrew H Hansen; Elizabeth Russell Esposito
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2021-01-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.