Literature DB >> 21093131

The effects of prosthetic ankle dorsiflexion and energy return on below-knee amputee leg loading.

Jessica D Ventura1, Glenn K Klute, Richard R Neptune.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic devices are intended to return lower limb amputees to their pre-amputation functional status. However, prosthetic devices designed for unilateral below-knee amputees have yet to completely restore the biomechanical functions normally provided by the ankle muscles, leading to gait asymmetries and increased reliance on their intact leg. In an effort to improve amputee gait, energy storage and return feet have been developed that store mechanical energy in elastic structures in early to mid-stance and return it in late stance. However, little is known regarding how ankle compliance and the level of energy return influences walking mechanics. The purpose of this study was to identify the influence of prosthetic ankle dorsiflexion and energy storage and return on leg loading during steady-state walking.
METHODS: Compliant ankles with different stiffness levels were attached to a Seattle Lightfoot2 in different orientations (forward- and reverse-facing).
FINDINGS: The ankles decreased residual leg vertical ground reaction forces in late stance, increased residual leg propulsive ground reaction force impulses and increased residual leg knee joint extensor moments. The reverse-facing ankles increased residual leg vertical ground reaction forces in early stance, and the compliant forward-facing ankle increased residual leg braking impulses. In contrast to previous studies, increased energy storage and return from compliant ankles did not decrease hip joint powers or the intact leg vertical ground reaction forces.
INTERPRETATION: These results provide insight into the relationships between ankle dorsiflexion, energy storage and return, and leg loading, which may lead to more effective prosthetic devices to improve amputee gait.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093131     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  7 in total

1.  Novel method to evaluate angular stiffness of prosthetic feet from linear compression tests.

Authors:  Peter G Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Optimization of prosthetic foot stiffness to reduce metabolic cost and intact knee loading during below-knee amputee walking: a theoretical study.

Authors:  Nicholas P Fey; Glenn K Klute; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Considering passive mechanical properties and patient user motor performance in lower limb prosthesis design optimization to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2017-07-17

5.  Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion.

Authors:  Max K Shepherd; Alejandro F Azocar; Matthew J Major; Elliott J Rouse
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle' damping.

Authors:  Alan R De Asha; Ramesh Munjal; Jai Kulkarni; John G Buckley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Comparing preference of ankle-foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists.

Authors:  Max K Shepherd; Elliott J Rouse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.