Literature DB >> 27570639

Informing Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Prescription through Haptic Emulation of Candidate Devices.

Joshua M Caputo1, Peter G Adamczyk2, Steven H Collins3.   

Abstract

Robotic prostheses can improve walking performance for amputees, but prescription of these devices has been hindered by their high cost and uncertainty about the degree to which individuals will benefit. The typical prescription process cannot well predict how an individual will respond to a device they have never used because it bases decisions on subjective assessment of an individual's current activity level. We propose a new approach in which individuals 'test drive' candidate devices using a prosthesis emulator while their walking performance is quantitatively assessed and results are distilled to inform prescription. In this system, prosthesis behavior is controlled by software rather than mechanical implementation, so users can quickly experience a broad range of devices. To test the viability of the approach, we developed a prototype emulator and assessment protocol, leveraging hardware and methods we previously developed for basic science experiments. We demonstrated emulations across the spectrum of commercially available prostheses, including traditional (e.g. SACH), dynamic-elastic (e.g. FlexFoot), and powered robotic (e.g. BiOM® T2) prostheses. Emulations exhibited low error with respect to reference data and provided subjectively convincing representations of each device. We demonstrated an assessment protocol that differentiated device classes for each individual based on quantitative performance metrics, providing feedback that could be used to make objective, personalized device prescriptions.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 27570639      PMCID: PMC4996637          DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7140104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom        ISSN: 2154-8080


  17 in total

1.  The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew H Hansen; Dudley S Childress; Steve C Miff; Steven A Gard; Kent P Mesplay
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study.

Authors:  L Torburn; J Perry; E Ayyappa; S L Shanfield
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1990

3.  Bionic ankle-foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation.

Authors:  Hugh M Herr; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effect of speed on the energy cost of walking in unilateral traumatic lower limb amputees.

Authors:  Joakim J Genin; Guillaume J Bastien; Bernard Franck; Christine Detrembleur; Patrick A Willems
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Amputee Independent Prosthesis Properties--a new model for description and measurement.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Martin Twiste; Laurence P J Kenney; David Howard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man.

Authors:  J M Brockway
Journal:  Hum Nutr Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-11

7.  Energy expenditure from minute-by-minute heart-rate recording: comparison with indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  G B Spurr; A M Prentice; P R Murgatroyd; G R Goldberg; J C Reina; N T Christman
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Control of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis based on a neuromuscular model.

Authors:  Michael F Eilenberg; Hartmut Geyer; Hugh Herr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation.

Authors:  C Hofstad; H Linde; J Limbeek; K Postema
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

10.  Prosthetic ankle push-off work reduces metabolic rate but not collision work in non-amputee walking.

Authors:  Joshua M Caputo; Steven H Collins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Deleterious Musculoskeletal Conditions Secondary to Lower Limb Loss: Considerations for Prosthesis-Related Factors.

Authors:  Ashley D Knight; Christopher L Dearth; Brad D Hendershot
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Human-in-the-loop Bayesian optimization of wearable device parameters.

Authors:  Myunghee Kim; Ye Ding; Philippe Malcolm; Jozefien Speeckaert; Christoper J Siviy; Conor J Walsh; Scott Kuindersma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Robotic Emulation of Candidate Prosthetic Foot Designs May Enable Efficient, Evidence-Based, and Individualized Prescriptions.

Authors:  Joshua M Caputo; Evan Dvorak; Kate Shipley; Mary Ann Miknevich; Peter G Adamczyk; Steven H Collins
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2021-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.