Matthew J Major1,2, Nicholas P Fey3,4. 1. Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago IL, USA. 2. Northwestern University Prosthetics Orthotics Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA. 3. University of Texas at Dallas, Departments of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, Richardson TX, USA. 4. UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dallas TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selection of prosthesis mechanical characteristics to restore function of persons with lower-limb loss can be framed as an optimization problem to satisfy a given performance objective. However, the choice of a particular objective is critical, and considering only device and generalizable outcomes across users without accounting for inherent motor performance likely restricts a given patient from fully realizing the benefits of a prosthetic intervention. OBJECTIVES: This review presents methods for optimizing passive below-knee prosthesis designs to maximize rehabilitation outcomes and how considerations on patient motor performance may enhance these outcomes. MAJOR FINDINGS: Available literature supports that considering patient-specific variables pertaining to motor performance permits a multidimensional landscape relating device characteristics and user function, which may yield more accurate predictions of rehabilitation outcomes for individual patients. Moreover, the addition of targeted physical therapeutic interventions that encourage user self-organization may further improve these outcomes. We note the potential of existing paradigms to address these additional dimensions, and we encourage investigators to consider the many different performance objectives available for prosthesis optimization. CONCLUSIONS: By considering user motor performance in combination with prosthesis mechanical characteristics, a staged optimization approach can be formulated which acknowledges that device modifications may only improve outcomes to a certain extent and user self-organization is a critical component to complete rehabilitation. An iterative process that can be integrated within existing rehabilitative practices accounts for changes in patient status through combined targeted prosthetic solutions and physical therapeutic techniques, and embodies the concept of personalized intervention for patients with lower limb-loss.
BACKGROUND: Selection of prosthesis mechanical characteristics to restore function of persons with lower-limb loss can be framed as an optimization problem to satisfy a given performance objective. However, the choice of a particular objective is critical, and considering only device and generalizable outcomes across users without accounting for inherent motor performance likely restricts a given patient from fully realizing the benefits of a prosthetic intervention. OBJECTIVES: This review presents methods for optimizing passive below-knee prosthesis designs to maximize rehabilitation outcomes and how considerations on patient motor performance may enhance these outcomes. MAJOR FINDINGS: Available literature supports that considering patient-specific variables pertaining to motor performance permits a multidimensional landscape relating device characteristics and user function, which may yield more accurate predictions of rehabilitation outcomes for individual patients. Moreover, the addition of targeted physical therapeutic interventions that encourage user self-organization may further improve these outcomes. We note the potential of existing paradigms to address these additional dimensions, and we encourage investigators to consider the many different performance objectives available for prosthesis optimization. CONCLUSIONS: By considering user motor performance in combination with prosthesis mechanical characteristics, a staged optimization approach can be formulated which acknowledges that device modifications may only improve outcomes to a certain extent and user self-organization is a critical component to complete rehabilitation. An iterative process that can be integrated within existing rehabilitative practices accounts for changes in patient status through combined targeted prosthetic solutions and physical therapeutic techniques, and embodies the concept of personalized intervention for patients with lower limb-loss.
Entities:
Keywords:
biomechanics; design; locomotion; motor control; optimization; prosthesis
Authors: Robert Gailey; Lynne V McFarland; Rory A Cooper; Joseph Czerniecki; Jeffrey M Gambel; Sharon Hubbard; Charles Maynard; Douglas G Smith; Michele Raya; Gayle E Reiber Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2010
Authors: Tibor Hortobágyi; Stanislaw Solnik; Allison Gruber; Patrick Rider; Ken Steinweg; Joseph Helseth; Paul DeVita Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Christopher Kevin Wong; Julie E Ehrlich; Jennifer C Ersing; Nicholas J Maroldi; Catharine E Stevenson; Matthew J Varca Journal: Prosthet Orthot Int Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Carey L Holleran; Don D Straube; Catherine R Kinnaird; Abigail L Leddy; T George Hornby Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Elisabeth Schaffalitzky; Sinead NiMhurchadha; Pamela Gallagher; Susan Hofkamp; Malcolm MacLachlan; Stephen T Wegener Journal: Prosthet Orthot Int Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Matthew J Major; Chelsi K Serba; Xinlin Chen; Nicholas Reimold; Franklyn Ndubuisi-Obi; Keith E Gordon Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 4.379