| Literature DB >> 23894433 |
Jehad Abubaker1, Ali Tiss, Mohamed Abu-Farha, Fahad Al-Ghimlas, Irina Al-Khairi, Engin Baturcam, Preethi Cherian, Naser Elkum, Maha Hammad, Jeena John, Sina Kavalakatt, Abdelkrim Khadir, Samia Warsame, Said Dermime, Kazem Behbehani, Mohammed Dehbi.
Abstract
Obesity is a major risk factor for a myriad of disorders such as insulin resistance and diabetes. The mechanisms underlying these chronic conditions are complex but low grade inflammation and alteration of the endogenous stress defense system are well established. Previous studies indicated that impairment of HSP-25 and HSP-72 was linked to obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes in humans and animals while their induction was associated with improved clinical outcomes. In an attempt to identify additional components of the heat shock response that may be dysregulated by obesity, we used the RT(2)-Profiler PCR heat shock array, complemented with RT-PCR and validated by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Using adipose tissue biopsies and PBMC of non-diabetic lean and obese subjects, we report the downregulation of DNAJB3 cochaperone mRNA and protein in obese that negatively correlated with percent body fat (P = 0.0001), triglycerides (P = 0.035) and the inflammatory chemokines IP-10 and RANTES (P = 0.036 and P = 0.02, respectively). DNAJB positively correlated with maximum oxygen consumption (P = 0.031). Based on the beneficial effect of physical exercise, we investigated its possible impact on DNAJB3 expression and indeed, we found that exercise restored the expression of DNAJB3 in obese subjects with a concomitant decrease of phosphorylated JNK. Using cell lines, DNAJB3 protein was reduced following treatment with palmitate and tunicamycin which is suggestive of the link between the expression of DNAJB3 and the activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress. DNAJB3 was also shown to coimmunoprecipiate with JNK and IKKβ stress kinases along with HSP-72 and thus, suggesting its potential role in modulating their activities. Taken together, these data suggest that DNAJB3 can potentially play a protective role against obesity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23894433 PMCID: PMC3722167 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Physical characteristics of subjects at baseline.
| Lean (n = 54) | Obese (n = 66) |
| |
|
| 37.24±10.89 | 44.88±12.12 |
|
|
| 18/36 | 37/29 |
|
|
| 22.39±2.09 | 34.57±2.95 |
|
|
| 27.37±5.13 | 38.37±5.01 |
|
|
| 80.74±15.84 | 108.53±12.16 |
|
|
| 92.29±14.67 | 118.55±8.27 |
|
|
| 0.86±0.10 | 0.92±0.10 |
|
Data are presented as mean ± SD. BMI (body mass index), PBF (percent body fat).
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of subjects at baseline.
| Lean (n = 54) | Obese (n = 66) |
| |
|
| 80.71±14.51 | 77.43±8.15 |
|
|
| 113.00±10.81 | 127.50±11.89 |
|
|
| 76.43±6.33 | 82.00±10.14 |
|
|
| 21.63±3.76 | 17.48±4.83 |
|
|
| 5.03±0.92 | 5.26±1.02 |
|
|
| 1.43±0.49 | 1.13±0.24 |
|
|
| 3.13±0.85 | 3.43±0.96 |
|
|
| 0.91±0.43 | 1.52±0.91 |
|
|
| 5.02±0.64 | 5.45±0.92 |
|
|
| 5.47±0.40 | 5.93±1.03 |
|
|
| 2.44±0.71 | 3.68±2.31 |
|
|
| 0.65±0.11 | 0.71±0.15 |
|
|
| 2.62±0.83 | 2.68±1.54 |
|
|
| 2.35±1.12 | 4.51±2.11 |
|
|
| 4.82±3.03 | 9.72±6.91 |
|
|
| 3.19±1.55 | 4.14±1.53 |
|
|
| 23.70±9.30 | 25.70±13.20 |
|
|
| 1.20±0.47 | 1.35±0.85 |
|
|
| 4.99±2.18 | 4.68±1.87 |
|
|
| 1.97±1.39 | 2.33±2.24 |
|
|
| 0.39±0.14 | 0.60±0.32 |
|
|
| 1.29±0.60 | 1.78±0.86 |
|
|
| 1.38±0.37 | 1.58±0.63 |
|
|
| 1.29±0.48 | 1.52±0.43 |
|
Data were adjusted for age and gender and presented as mean ± SD. HR (heart rate), SBP (systolic blood pressure), DBP (diastolic blood pressure), V
Primer sequences used for real time PCR to analyze gene expression status of human heat shock-related genes.
| Genes | Primers |
|
| Forward: |
|
| Forward: |
|
| Forward: |
|
| Forward: |
|
| Forward: |
|
| Forward: |
|
| Forward: |
|
| Forward: |
Figure 1Downregulation of members of Hsp-40 in obese subjects.
Total RNA was isolated from PBMC (A) and adipose tissue biopsies (B) of lean (n = 14) and obese (n = 17) non-diabetic participants and subjected to quantitative analysis using real-time PCR. The data are presented as fold changes in obese compared to lean subjects. * P<0.05 as determined using student's t-test.
Figure 2Obesity triggers a downregulation of DNAJB3 protein.
(A) Total proteins were extracted from PBMC of lean (n = 4) and obese (n = 4) non-diabetic participants and subjected to western blot using the indicated antibodies. The bands were quantified as described in materials and methods and the relative intensity was determined after correction with actin that was used as internal control to monitor loading efficiency. The data are presented at the bottom as fold changes compared to lean group. The blots shown are representative of at least three independent experiments with consistent results. (B) Immunohistochemical staining using subcutaneous adipose biopsies from lean (n = 4) and obese (n = 11) non-diabetic participants. Aperio software was used to quantify positive staining (indicated by arrows) and the values are illustrated at the bottom as fold changes compared to lean. As negative control (NC) for the experiment, the primary antibodies were omitted. * P<0.05 as determined using student's t-test.
Physical and clinical characteristics of 24 obese subjects before and after exercise.
| Before exercise | After exercise |
| |
|
| 47.78±13.02 | – | – |
|
| 17/7 | – | – |
|
| 34.60±2.95 | 33.93±2.44 |
|
|
| 37.48±5.35 | 36.63±5.71 |
|
|
| 108.93±11.32 | 107.33±9.10 |
|
|
| 117.51±9.42 | 117.88±6.59 |
|
|
| 77.43±8.15 | 77.00±10.30 |
|
|
| 127.50±11.89 | 119.29±8.29 |
|
|
| 82.00±10.14 | 77.86±4.26 |
|
|
| 17.48±4.83 | 19.66±5.17 |
|
|
| 5.26±1.03 | 5.18±0.99 |
|
|
| 1.16±0.25 | 1.05±0.25 |
|
|
| 3.35±0.95 | 3.40±0.94 |
|
|
| 1.71±0.93 | 1.63±0.71 |
|
|
| 5.76±1.08 | 5.91±1.03 |
|
|
| 6.17±1.44 | 5.99±0.56 |
|
|
| 2.89±1.48 | 3.40±1.16 |
|
|
| 0.63±0.16 | 0.54±0.10 |
|
|
| 2.31±1.66 | 1.83±0.45 |
|
|
| 3.04±1.96 | 1.52±1.15 |
|
|
| 7.01±3.60 | 5.03±2.88 |
|
|
| 3.33±1.30 | 3.06±1.17 |
|
|
| 21.60±14.45 | 13.62±10.56 |
|
|
| 3.85±1.35 | 2.43±1.21 |
|
|
| 0.47±0.18 | 0.30±0.19 |
|
|
| 1.75±0.67 | 1.62±0.63 |
|
|
| 1.46±0.30 | 0.97±0.23 |
|
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Paired t-test was used to compare differences in obese before and after physical exercise.
Figure 3Physical exercise restores the expression of DNAJB3.
(A) Quantitative analysis of DNAJB3 mRNA levels in the adipose tissue from obese before exercise (n = 10) and after 3 months of exercise (n = 10) using real-time PCR. (B and C) Immunohistochemical staining using subcutaneous adipose biopsies from obese subjects before exercise (n = 11) and after 3 months of exercise (n = 7) using DNAJB3 (B) and Phopsho-JNK (C) antibodies. Arrows indicate the positive staining. Aperio software was used for quantification and the values are illustrated at the bottom as fold changes after exercise. Student's t-test for two group analysis was done to compare the expression of DNAJB3 (B) and JNK (C) in obese before and after exercise. *: P<0.05.
Correlation between DNAJB3 mRNA expression and physical, clinical and biochemical parameters.
| Before exercise | After exercise | |||
| R2 |
| R2 |
| |
|
| −0.709 |
| − |
|
|
| −0.656 |
| − |
|
|
| −0.296 |
|
|
|
|
| −0.02 |
| − |
|
|
| 0.038 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.136 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.556 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.301 |
| − |
|
|
| −0.358 |
| − |
|
|
| −0.322 |
| − |
|
|
| −0.162 |
|
|
|
|
| −0.367 |
|
|
|
|
| −0.404 |
|
|
|
The correlation was based on ΔΔCT method and it was done on non-diabetic participants before exercise consisting of lean (n = 14), obese before exercise (n = 21) and obese after exercise (n = 17). Correlation was assessed by using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
Figure 4DNAJB3 forms a complex with HSP-72 and stress kinases in vitro by coimmunoprecipitation.
(A) HEK-293 cells transfected Flag-tagged DNAJB3 and proteins lysates were coimmunprecipitated with anti-Flag antibody. Eluted proteins were subjected to western blot analysis using JNK, IKKβ and HSP-72 antibodies. Flag-tagged ATF-6 vector and pcDNA empty vector were run in parallel and used as controls. Anti-Flag antibody was also used to monitor for transfection efficiency and binding of the recombinant proteins to the anti-Flag antibody. To investigate endogenous formation of DNAJB3/HSP-72/JNK complex, whole cell lysate proteins were prepared from HEK293 cells and used to pull down the immunocomplex using either anti-DNAJB3 (B) or anti-HSP-72 (C) antibody. Eluted proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blotting using the appropriate antibodies as indicated.
Figure 5Downregulation of DNAJB protein in vitro following activation of ER stress by palmitate and tunicamycin.
Western blot analysis using protein lysates from THP-1 cells (A) and L6 cells (B) after stimulation with 25 ng/ml of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, 30 μM of H2O2, 1 μg/ml of tunicamycin and from 50 to 500 μM of palimate for overnight. DMSO at 1% and 0.5% BSA were used as controls for vehicles. Actin and GAPDH were used as internal controls to monitor for loading efficiency. (C) Effect of plamitate on the expression of HSP-60 and HSP-90 along with DNAJB3. The blots shown are representatives of at least three independent experiments with consistent results.