Literature DB >> 23070014

Integration of autophagy, proteasomal degradation, unfolded protein response and apoptosis.

D M Benbrook1, A Long.   

Abstract

A single cell has the potential to kill an entire human being. Efforts to cure cancer are limited by survival of individual cancer cells despite immune surveillance and toxic therapies. Understanding the intricate network of pathways that maintain cellular homeostasis and mediate stress response or default into cell death is critical to the development of strategies to eradicate cancer. Autophagy, proteasomal degradation and the unfolded protein response (UPR) are cellular pathways that degrade and recycle excess or damaged proteins to maintain cellular homeostasis and survival. This review will discuss autophagy and how it is integrated with proteasomal degradation and UPR to govern cell fate through restoration of cellular homeostasis or default into the apoptotic cell death pathway. The first response of autophagy is macroautophagy, which sequesters cytoplasm including organelles inside double-membraned autophagosome vesicles that fuse with lysosomes to degrade and recycle the contents. Ubiquitination patterns on proteins targeted for degradation determine whether adapter proteins will bring them to developing autophagosomes or to proteasomes. Macroautophagy is followed by chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), in which Hsc70 (Heat shock cognate 70) selectively binds proteins with exposed KFERQ motifs and pushes them inside lysosomes through the LAMP-2A (Lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A) receptor. These two processes and the lesser understood microautophagy, which involves direct engulfment of proteins into lysosomes, occur at basal and induced levels. Insufficient proteasome function or ER stress induction of UPR can induce autophagy, which can mitigate damage and stress. If this network is incapable of repairing the damage or overcoming continued stress, the default pathway of apoptosis is engaged to destroy the cell. Induction of macroautophagy by cancer therapeutics has led to clinical trials investigating combinations of HCQ (hydroxychloriquine) suppression of autophagy with apoptosis-inducing agents. Further study of the complex integration of autophagy, proteasomal degradation, UPR and apoptosis is likely to provide additional targets for our fight against cancer. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Apoptosis: Four Decades Later".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23070014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Oncol        ISSN: 1812-9269


  90 in total

Review 1.  Autophagy regulation in the development and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuting Zhou; Edmund B Rucker; Binhua P Zhou
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.848

Review 2.  The Autophagy Lysosomal Pathway and Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Steven Finkbeiner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Compensatory increases of select proteostasis networks after Hsp70 inhibition in cancer cells.

Authors:  Sara Sannino; Christopher J Guerriero; Amit J Sabnis; Donna Beer Stolz; Callen T Wallace; Peter Wipf; Simon C Watkins; Trever G Bivona; Jeffrey L Brodsky
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Proteomic profile of maternal-aged blastocoel fluid suggests a novel role for ubiquitin system in blastocyst quality.

Authors:  Gabriella Tedeschi; Elena Albani; Elena Monica Borroni; Valentina Parini; Anna Maria Brucculeri; Elisa Maffioli; Armando Negri; Simona Nonnis; Mauro Maccarrone; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  LAMP2 expression dictates azacytidine response and prognosis in MDS/AML.

Authors:  Alix Dubois; Nathan Furstoss; Patrick Auberger; Guillaume Robert; Anne Calleja; Marwa Zerhouni; Thomas Cluzeau; Coline Savy; Sandrine Marchetti; Mohamed Amine Hamouda; Sonia Boulakirba; François Orange; Sandra Lacas-Gervais; Jean-Michel Karsenti; Nicolas Mounier; Jérôme Tamburini; Alexandre Puissant; Frederic Luciano; Arnaud Jacquel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Role of autophagy in methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in rat primary astrocytes.

Authors:  Fang Yuntao; Guo Chenjia; Zhang Panpan; Zhao Wenjun; Wang Suhua; Xing Guangwei; Shi Haifeng; Lu Jian; Peng Wanxin; Feng Yun; Jiyang Cai; Michael Aschner; Lu Rongzhu
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Bottom-up proteomics analysis of the secretome of murine islets of Langerhans in elevated glucose levels.

Authors:  Andrew Schmudlach; Jeremy Felton; Robert T Kennedy; Norman J Dovichi
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 8.  Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling in diabetic endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Yunzhou Dong; Conrad Fernandes; Yanjun Liu; Yong Wu; Hao Wu; Megan L Brophy; Lin Deng; Kai Song; Aiyun Wen; Scott Wong; Daoguang Yan; Rheal Towner; Hong Chen
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Unique integrated stress response sensors regulate cancer cell susceptibility when Hsp70 activity is compromised.

Authors:  Sara Sannino; Megan E Yates; Mark E Schurdak; Steffi Oesterreich; Adrian V Lee; Peter Wipf; Jeffrey L Brodsky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  WNT16-expressing Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells are Sensitive to Autophagy Inhibitors after ER Stress Induction.

Authors:  Meletios Verras; Ioanna Papandreou; Nicholas C Denko
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.480

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.