Literature DB >> 23886012

Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction.

Tung Nguyen1, Lucia Cevidanes, Beatriz Paniagua, Hongtu Zhu, Leonardo Koerich, Hugo De Clerck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) skeletal changes in the mandibles of Class III patients treated with bone-anchored maxillary protraction using shape correspondence analysis. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Twenty-five consecutive patients with skeletal Class III who were between the ages of 9 and 13 years (mean age, 11.10 ± 1.1 years) were treated using Class III intermaxillary elastics and bilateral miniplates (two in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla and two in the anterior mandible). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed for each patient before initial loading (T1) and at 1 year out (T2). From the CBCT scans, 3D models were generated, registered on the anterior cranial base, and analyzed using 3D linear distances and vectors between corresponding point-based surfaces.
RESULTS: Bone-anchored traction produced anteroposterior and vertical skeletal changes in the mandible. The novel application of Shape correspondence analysis showed vectors of mean (± standard deviation) distal displacement of the posterior ramus of 3.6 ± 1.4 mm, while the chin displaced backward by 0.5 ± 3.92 mm. The lower border of the mandible at the menton region was displaced downward by 2.6 ± 1.2 mm, and the lower border at the gonial region moved downward by 3.6 ± 1.4 mm. There was a downward and backward displacement around the gonial region with a mean closure of the gonial angle by 2.1°. The condyles were displaced distally by a mean of 2.6 ± 1.5 mm, and there were three distinct patterns for displacement: 44% backward, 40% backward and downward, and 16% backward and upward.
CONCLUSION: This treatment approach induces favorable control of the mandibular growth pattern and can be used to treat patients with components of mandibular prognathism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23886012      PMCID: PMC4394197          DOI: 10.2319/041513-288.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  22 in total

1.  Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children.

Authors:  H S Baik
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups.

Authors:  A J Kapust; P M Sinclair; P K Turley
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Morphologic adaptation of temporomandibular joint after chincup therapy.

Authors:  H Mimura; T Deguchi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.

Authors:  E C Guyer; E E Ellis; J A McNamara; R G Behrents
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Early treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chincap appliance.

Authors:  R A Allen; I H Connolly; A Richardson
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years.

Authors:  A Björk; V Skieller
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Biomechanical effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex.

Authors:  S Hata; T Itoh; M Nakagawa; K Kamogashira; K Ichikawa; M Matsumoto; S J Chaconas
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The effects of mandibular retractive force on the growing rat mandible.

Authors:  T Asano
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Outcome quantification using SPHARM-PDM toolbox in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Beatriz Paniagua; Lucia Cevidanes; Hongtu Zhu; Martin Styner
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.924

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.

Authors:  S D Kapila; J M Nervina
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Fernando Pugliese; Renata Mayumi Kato; Renato Faco; Marilia Yatabe; Hilde Timmerman; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Incorporating 3-dimensional models in online articles.

Authors:  Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio C O Ruellas; Julien Jomier; Tung Nguyen; Steve Pieper; Francois Budin; Martin Styner; Beatriz Paniagua
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment.

Authors:  B Q Souki; P L C Vilefort; D D Oliveira; I Andrade; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; T Nguyen; L Franchi; J A McNamara; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal.

Authors:  Renato Faco; Marilia Yatabe; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hilde Timmerman; Hugo J De Clerck; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE): three-dimensional superimposition on cranial base.

Authors:  Fábio Romano; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato; Maria Conceição Pereira Saraiva; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.

Authors:  Apoorva Kamath; Shetty Suhani Sudhakar; Greeshma Kannan; Kripal Rai; Athul Sb
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

8.  Three-dimensional regional displacement after surgical-orthodontic correction of Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  L Koerich; A C O Ruellas; B Paniagua; M Styner; T Turvey; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 9.  3D superimposition of craniofacial imaging-The utility of multicentre collaborations.

Authors:  Marilia Yatabe; Juan Carlos Prieto; Martin Styner; Hongtu Zhu; Antonio Carlos Ruellas; Beatriz Paniagua; Francois Budin; Erika Benavides; Brandon Shoukri; Loic Michoud; Nina Ribera; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ersin Yildirim; Seniz Karacay; Mustafa Erkan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.684

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.