INTRODUCTION: Bone-anchored maxillary protraction has been shown to be an effective treatment modality for the correction of Class III malocclusions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 3-dimensional changes in the maxilla, the surrounding hard and soft tissues, and the circummaxillary sutures after bone-anchored maxillary protraction treatment. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive skeletal Class III patients between the ages of 9 and 13 years (mean, 11.10 ± 1.1 years) were treated with Class III intermaxillary elastics and bilateral miniplates (2 in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla and 2 in the anterior mandible). Cone-beam computed tomographs were taken before initial loading and 1 year out. Three-dimensional models were generated from the tomographs, registered on the anterior cranial base, superimposed, and analyzed by using color maps. RESULTS: The maxilla showed a mean forward displacement of 3.7 mm, and the zygomas and the maxillary incisors came forward 3.7 and 4.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This treatment approach produced significant orthopedic changes in the maxilla and the zygomas in growing Class III patients.
INTRODUCTION: Bone-anchored maxillary protraction has been shown to be an effective treatment modality for the correction of Class III malocclusions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 3-dimensional changes in the maxilla, the surrounding hard and soft tissues, and the circummaxillary sutures after bone-anchored maxillary protraction treatment. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive skeletal Class III patients between the ages of 9 and 13 years (mean, 11.10 ± 1.1 years) were treated with Class III intermaxillary elastics and bilateral miniplates (2 in the infrazygomatic crests of the maxilla and 2 in the anterior mandible). Cone-beam computed tomographs were taken before initial loading and 1 year out. Three-dimensional models were generated from the tomographs, registered on the anterior cranial base, superimposed, and analyzed by using color maps. RESULTS: The maxilla showed a mean forward displacement of 3.7 mm, and the zygomas and the maxillary incisors came forward 3.7 and 4.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This treatment approach produced significant orthopedic changes in the maxilla and the zygomas in growing Class III patients.
Authors: Lucia H C Cevidanes; Gavin Heymann; Marie A Cornelis; Hugo J DeClerck; J F Camilla Tulloch Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara Journal: Orthod Craniofac Res Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Marília Yatabe; Daniela Gamba Garib; Renato André de Souza Faco; Hugo de Clerck; Guilherme Janson; Tung Nguyen; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos Ruellas Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.650