Literature DB >> 31074129

3D superimposition of craniofacial imaging-The utility of multicentre collaborations.

Marilia Yatabe1, Juan Carlos Prieto2, Martin Styner2, Hongtu Zhu2, Antonio Carlos Ruellas1, Beatriz Paniagua3, Francois Budin3, Erika Benavides1, Brandon Shoukri1, Loic Michoud1, Nina Ribera1, Lucia Cevidanes1.   

Abstract

Clinical applications of 3D image registration and superimposition have contributed to better understanding growth changes and clinical outcomes. The use of 3D dental and craniofacial imaging in dentistry requires validate image analysis methods for improved diagnosis, treatment planning, navigation and assessment of treatment response. Volumetric 3D images, such as cone-beam computed tomography, can now be superimposed by voxels, surfaces or landmarks. Regardless of the image modality or the software tools, the concepts of regions or points of reference affect all quantitative of qualitative assessments. This study reviews current state of the art in 3D image analysis including 3D superimpositions relative to the cranial base and different regional superimpositions, the development of open source and commercial tools for 3D analysis, how this technology has increased clinical research collaborations from centres all around the globe, some insight on how to incorporate artificial intelligence for big data analysis and progress towards personalized orthodontics.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D analysis; artificial intelligence; personalized orthodontics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31074129      PMCID: PMC6660909          DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  54 in total

1.  SUTURAL GROWTH OF THE UPPER FACE STUDIED BY THE IMPLANT METHOD.

Authors:  A BJORK
Journal:  Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc       Date:  1964

2.  Longitudinal cephalometric roentgenographic study of face and cranium in relation to body height.

Authors:  J K BAMBHA
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls.

Authors:  Gregory L Adams; Stuart A Gansky; Arthur J Miller; William E Harrell; David C Hatcher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.

Authors:  Stella Efstratiadis; Sheldon Baumrind; Frances Shofer; Ulla Jacobsson-Hunt; Larry Laster; Joseph Ghafari
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  L H S Cevidanes; L J Bailey; G R Tucker; M A Styner; A Mol; C L Phillips; W R Proffit; T Turvey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  ALARA still applies.

Authors:  Allan G Farman
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-10

Review 7.  Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption.

Authors:  S Krarup; T A Darvann; P Larsen; J L Marsh; S Kreiborg
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.

Authors:  Lucia H S Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 9.  Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern homo by morphometric analysis.

Authors:  F Bookstein; K Schäfer; H Prossinger; H Seidler; M Fieder; C Stringer; G W Weber; J L Arsuaga; D E Slice; F J Rohlf; W Recheis; A J Mariam; L F Marcus
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1999-12-15

10.  Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.

Authors:  S S Efstratiadis; G Cohen; J Ghafari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cone Beam Computerized Tomographic Analysis of Collum Angle of the Maxillary Central Incisors in Different Types of Malocclusion: Comparative Assessment in Saudi, Jordan and Egypt Subpopulation.

Authors:  Rakhi Issrani; Namdeo Prabhu; Sunitha Siddanna; Sarah Hatab Alanazi; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Manay Srinivas Munisekhar; May Othman Hamza; Reham Fawzi Dawood Shabanah; Rasha Saleh Ali Gadh
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Comparison of surface- and voxel-based registration on the mandibular ramus for long-term three-dimensional assessment of condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Michael Boelstoft Holte; Henrik Sæderup; Else Marie Pinholt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes.

Authors:  Deepal Haresh Ajmera; Richard Tai-Chiu Hsung; Pradeep Singh; Natalie Sui Miu Wong; Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Walter Yu Hang Lam; Balvinder S Khambay; Yiu Yan Leung; Min Gu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 4.  Craniofacial photographic superimposition: New developments.

Authors:  Douglas H Ubelaker; Yaohan Wu; Quinnlan R Cordero
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.395

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.