Literature DB >> 30865780

Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal.

Renato Faco1, Marilia Yatabe2, Lucia H S Cevidanes2, Hilde Timmerman3, Hugo J De Clerck4, Daniela Garib5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cephalometric outcome of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in individuals with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The experimental group (EG) comprised 23 individuals (17 males and 6 females) with UCLP and a mean age of 11.7 years. At least 6 months after secondary alveolar bone grafting, Bollard miniplates were installed in the posterior region of the maxilla and in the anterior region of the mandible. Class III elastics were recommended to be worn for 24 hours/day for a mean time of 18 months. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was obtained before (T1) and after treatment (T2). The control group (CG) consisted of 23 individuals with UCLP matched by initial age and gender with the EG and without any orthopaedic or surgical intervention performed between T1 and T2. The interval between T1 and T2 observations was 18 months for both groups. Twenty-one cephalometric variables were analysed. Intra- and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired and independent t-tests, respectively (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: BAMP caused a greater maxillary protrusion (SNA) and a greater decrease of Class III maxillomandibular discrepancy (ANB and Wits appraisal) compared with the CG. BAMP also caused a counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (Occ Plane to FH) and an improvement in the molar relationship compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS: BAMP therapy demonstrated a significant orthopaedic maxillary protraction and an improvement in the Class III skeletal pattern in UCLP.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30865780      PMCID: PMC6939645          DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjz005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  28 in total

1.  Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth.

Authors:  Takafumi Susami; Mari Okayasu; Takato Inokuchi; Kazumi Ohkubo; Natsuko Uchino; Kiwako Uwatoko; Naoko Takahashi-Ichikawa; Kouhei Nagahama; Tsuyoshi Takato
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2013-09-06

2.  Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate.

Authors:  M Mars; D A Plint; W J Houston; O Bergland; G Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1987-10

4.  Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals.

Authors:  Martina Eichenberger; Christine B Staudt; Nikolaos Pandis; Wanda Gnoinski; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team.

Authors:  G Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1991-01

7.  Short- and Long-Term Effects of Late Maxillary Advancement With the Liou-Alt-RAMEC Protocol in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Maria Costanza Meazzini; Laura B Zappia; Chiara Tortora; Luca Autelitano; Roberto Tintinelli
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2018-04-27

8.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: 3-dimensional assessment of maxillary effects.

Authors:  Marília Yatabe; Daniela Gamba Garib; Renato André de Souza Faco; Hugo de Clerck; Guilherme Janson; Tung Nguyen; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos Ruellas
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.

Authors:  R S Tindlund
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1994-07

10.  Effects of reverse headgear treatment on sagittal correction in girls born with unilateral complete cleft lip and cleft palate--skeletal and dental changes.

Authors:  L L So
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Fernando Pugliese; Renata Mayumi Kato; Renato Faco; Marilia Yatabe; Hilde Timmerman; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Retrognathic maxilla in individuals born with oral clefts is due to intrinsic factors and not only due to early surgical treatment.

Authors:  Rosa Helena W Lacerda; Alexandre R Vieira
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Cephalometric Predictors of Future need for Orthognathic Surgery in Korean Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Despite Long-term Use of Facemask with Miniplate.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Yu; Seung-Hak Baek; Jin-Young Choi; Jong-Ho Lee; Sukwha Kim; Sung-Woon On
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.372

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.