Literature DB >> 3485393

Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.

E C Guyer, E E Ellis, J A McNamara, R G Behrents.   

Abstract

A statistical comparison of cross-sectional cephalometric records of Class III malocclusion subjects from ages 5-15 with serial Class I controls, finding strong tendencies for early appearance of distinctive characteristics.

Mesh：

Year:  1986        PMID： 3485393     DOI： 10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056<0007:COCIMI>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN： 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  67 in total

1.  Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a Saudi population living in the western region.

Authors:  Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-02

2.  Localisation of deformations of the midfacial complex in subjects with class III malocclusions employing thin-plate spline analysis.

Authors:  G D Singh; J A McNamara; S Lozanoff
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Tuba Unal; Husamettin Oktay; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Time and pattern of the fusion of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis in patients with skeletal Class I and Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Jae-Hee Yang; Bong-Kuen Cha; Dong-Soon Choi; Jae Hyun Park; Insan Jang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Anteroposterior length of the maxillary complex and its relationship with the anterior cranial base.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Francesca Massetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Andy W K Yeung; Ray Tanaka; Corrado Paganelli; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  A Novel Technique to Overcome Treatment Delay Between Facemask Therapy and Comprehensive Orthodontic Correction.

Authors:  Jalis Fatima; Subrata Saha; Subir Sarkar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

8.  Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniele Nóbrega Nardoni; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

10.  Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.

Authors:  Hugo J De Clerck; Marie A Cornelis; Lucia H Cevidanes; Gavin C Heymann; Camilla J F Tulloch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.