Literature DB >> 23885146

A new pancreaticojejunostomy technique: a battle against postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Stylianos Katsaragakis1, Andreas Larentzakis, Sotirios-Georgios Panousopoulos, Konstantinos G Toutouzas, Dimitrios Theodorou, Spyridon Stergiopoulos, Georgios Androulakis.   

Abstract

AIM: To present a new technique of end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with seromuscular jejunal flap formation, and insertion of a silicone stent.
METHODS: We present an end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with seromuscular jejunal flap formation, and the insertion of a silicone stent. This technique was performed in thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure by the same surgical team, from January 2005 to March 2011. The surgical procedure performed in all cases was classic pancreaticoduodenectomy, without preservation of the pylorus. The diagnosis of pancreatic leakage was defined as a drain output of any measurable volume of fluid on or after postoperative day 3 with an amylase concentration greater than three times the serum amylase activity.
RESULTS: There were 32 patients who underwent end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with seromuscular jejunal flap formation. Thirteen of them were women and 19 were men. These data correspond to 40.6% and 59.4%, respectively. The mean age was 64.2 years, ranging from 55 to 82 years. The mean operative time was 310.2 ± 40.0 min, and was defined as the time period from the intubation up to the extubation of the patient. Also, the mean time needed to perform the pancreaticojejunostomy was 22.7 min, ranging from 18 to 25 min. Postoperatively, one patient developed a low output pancreatic fistula, three patients developed surgical site infection, and one patient developed pneumonia. The rate of overall morbidity was 15.6%. There was no 30-d postoperative mortality.
CONCLUSION: This modification appears to be a significantly safe approach to the pancreaticojejunostomy without adversely affecting operative time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Seromuscular jejunal flap; Technique; Whipple

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23885146      PMCID: PMC3718903          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i27.4351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

1.  Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Siu Hung Lo; Daniel Fong; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Mascetta; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Andrew Gumbs; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant.

Authors:  M I van Berge Henegouwen; L T De Wit; T M Van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  An Appraisal of Pancreatoduodenal Resection: A Follow-up Study of 61 Cases.

Authors:  R B Cattell; L J Pyrtek
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is preferable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for longterm outcomes of pancreatic exocrine function.

Authors:  Alexandre Rault; Antonio SaCunha; Daniel Klopfenstein; Dominique Larroudé; Frédéric N Dobo Epoy; Denis Collet; Bernard Masson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the conservative treatment of choice.

Authors:  Luciana B P Haddad; Olivier Scatton; Bruto Randone; Wellington Andraus; Pierre-Philippe Massault; Bertrand Dousset; Olivier Soubrane
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Shu You Peng; Jian Wei Wang; Wan Yee Lau; Xiu Jun Cai; Yi Ping Mou; Ying Bin Liu; Jiang Tao Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  8 in total

1.  Internal compared with external drainage of pancreatic duct during pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Guangxing Meng; Qianzhe Xing; Qiang Yuan; Zhi Du; Yijun Wang; Hua Meng
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Risk Factors and Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-center Experience.

Authors:  Zun-Xiang Ke; Jiong-Xin Xiong; Jin Hu; Heng-Yu Chen; Qin Li; Yi-Qing Li
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-16

3.  Significance of preoperative radiographic pancreatic density in predicting pancreatic fistula after surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Yasmine Assadipour; Saïd C Azoury; Nicholas N Schaub; Young Hong; Robert Eil; Suzanne M Inchauste; Seth M Steinberg; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Steven K Libutti; Marybeth S Hughes
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Qi-Yu Liu; Wen-Zhi Zhang; Hong-Tian Xia; Jian-Jun Leng; Tao Wan; Bin Liang; Tao Yang; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Analysis of risk factors for hemorrhage and related outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy in an intermediate-volume center.

Authors:  Fabio Uggeri; Luca Nespoli; Marta Sandini; Anita Andreano; Luca Degrate; Fabrizio Romano; Laura Antolini; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-08-02

6.  Impact of Deserosalization on Small Bowel Anastomosis Healing in Swine: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gavriella-Zoi Vrakopoulou; Konstantinos G Toutouzas; Panagiotis Giannios; Sotirios-Georgios Panousopoulos; Charalampos Theodoropoulos; Eugene Danas; Aliki Liakea; Apostolos E Papalois; George Zografos; Andreas Larentzakis
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Continuous suturing with two anterior layers reduces post-operative complications and hospitalization time in pancreaticoenterostomy.

Authors:  Guoliang Yao; Yonggang Fan; Jingming Zhai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Modified protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery is beneficial for Chinese cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xiaxing Deng; Xi Cheng; Zhen Huo; Yuan Shi; Zhijian Jin; Haoran Feng; Yue Wang; Chenlei Wen; Hao Qian; Ren Zhao; Weihua Qiu; Baiyong Shen; Chenghong Peng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.